> > > Maybe you should look into libusb-1.0.10 release to show that
> > > libusb is still relevant...
> >... or maybe he should find more productive ways to spend his time
> > than trying to pretend playing catch-up with a more active and more
> > featureful fork, which was already adopted by the m
> > I think it turned out very good once
> > it was done, but anyway, everyone is busy working on new and even
> > better versions now. :)
>
> It is probably good enough for Mac OS X and Linux. But on Windows,
> libusb-1.0.9 is basically not usable due to missing important fixes.
> And even under L
> > > No, you are forcing me to change my program to have it build with
> > > your change, you should do it the other way around. If you want
> > > programs to use your library, make it so that they don't have to
> > > be changed at all.
> > >
> > > And if I'm going to be forced to change my progr
