Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] All OS: Update shared library version to indicated that new APIs were added (#122)

2013-07-30 Thread Max Horn
Libtool versioning should in particular work for cross platform applications, and I have used it a lot for that purpose myself. But admittedly never with Windows, which is unfortunately behaving very differently when it comes to shared libraries compared to POSIX systems. So in some sense I am n

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Task: Update website and documentation to reflect libusb and libusb merge (#123)

2013-07-30 Thread Max Horn
I appreciate that merging is incomplete and still requires a lot of work. But my complaint is that this is highly intransparent, and the result is confusing to outsiders. Indeed, except for that email I dug out from a mailing list archive, there is no explicit hint that the libusb and libusbx pr

[Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Update website and documentation to reflect libusb and libusb merge (#123)

2013-07-23 Thread Max Horn
I just discovered that libusb and libusbx merged. That is, what I did notice was that the download link on http://www.libusb.org/ suddenly is pointing to libusbx... but it wasn't quite clear if that was done in good faith or rather a hostile takeover (see also the terrible ffmpeg vs. libav saga)

[Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] Update shared library version to indicated that new APIs were added (#122)

2013-07-23 Thread Max Horn
This pull request update the libtool versioning data in configure.ac for the libusb shared library. There is a nice comment in your configure.ac that explains how to properly do this, unfortunately, it seems this has been ignored: Many new APIs have been added to libusb and old ones extended, w