On 12 March 2013 22:42, Pete Batard wrote:
> I guess I'll bite, and fill you in on a few details, to try to offer a
> different perspective from what you seem to _perceive_.
Sure, it was meant somewhat tongue-in-cheek, so I appreciate the
response. I'm not deliberately trolling.
> Ergo, the time
On 12 March 2013 14:05, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> * libusb_resetep
> Not implemented yet.
> Ref: https://github.com/libusbx/libusbx/issues/18
Seems no-one is interested. :(
>> * libusb_handle_events_check
> This is probably an extension by Graeme.
Seems to be discussed in http://www.libusb.org/tic
Hi all,
I'm trying to build Argyllcms 1.5.1 for Fedora using the libusbx code
rather than the internal USB implementation. Using the system
libraries rather than bundled libraries is best practice for most
distros, so I'm trying this way first.
ArgyllCMS seems to require the following functions,
On 19 April 2012 11:00, Pete Batard wrote:
> Therefore, if you are tired of the lack of progress/releases from
> libusb, or from having to deal with a project that doesn't seem to go
> anywhere, you are very much invited to visit http://libusbx.org, or our
> SourceForge page at https://sourceforge
