[Libusbx-devel] [PATCH] Prefix LOG_LEVEL_ with LIBUSB_ to avoid conflicts

pat-0.1.4' make: *** [all] Fehler 2 greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] fails to include needed symbols; not suitable replacement for libusb

Am 03.07.2012 09:26, schrieb Ludovic Rousseau: > 2012/7/3 Tobias Powalowski : >> Am 03.07.2012 08:49, schrieb Ludovic Rousseau: >>> Why is the lib called libusb.a and not libusb-1.0.a? >>> >>> My hypothesis is that libusb.a comes from libusb-compat and is not

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] fails to include needed symbols; not suitable replacement for libusb

Can you check that? Correct, does that mean i need to rebuild libusb-compat against libusbx? > > Another good idea is to NOT distribute a static lib. Only the dynamic > .so should be provided. But that is not the problem. I already disabled static lib in libusbx. Thanks for your help,

[Libusbx-devel] [libusbx] fails to include needed symbols; not suitable replacement for libusb

Hi guys, got that bugreport: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30467 any idea how to solve it? thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signa