Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-12 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > Nice. I just carried some simple tests under Mac OS X 10.9.1 (Mac > Mini 2011) and NetBSD 6.1.1 (VirtualBox VM) using libusbx-1.0.18-rc1 > and both are fine. > > For NetBSD, there are three known warnings about "dereferencing > type-punned po

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-11 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Pete Batard wrote: > All, > > It is my great pleasure to announce libusb-1.0.18 RC1, which marks the > long awaited merge-back of libusbx with libusb! > ... > To check the RC, you are invited to go http://libusb.info, and use the > Download menu, which should give y

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-09 Thread Pete Batard
Hi Joshua, On 2014.01.09 19:57, Joshua Blake wrote: > Change there -> here, since this is read on the new site (rather than an > email referencing it.) This will eliminate confusion about whether > you're referencing "this" site here (libusb.info ) > or the old site. Good poin

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-09 Thread Joshua Blake
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Pete Batard wrote: > libusb.info > Pete, First congrats on the merge. Small suggestion on this the new site: What happened to the old site? The old site is now obsolete. Please use *libusb.info *. All of the libusb development has moved th

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-09 Thread Pete Batard
On 2014.01.09 06:30, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: > How much difference will there be to libusbx-1.0.18 and libusb-1.0.18? As far as developers are concerned, no difference. > What I mean is; will the merge simply be a copy of the current libusbx > code to the libusb repository Yup. Just one extra

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-09 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2014/1/9 Nothing : > > I can not find the conifigure file Maybe that is because the real file name is configure and not conifigure? The archive libusb-1.0.18-rc1.tar.bz2 _DO_ contain the configure file. Of course the github repository do not contain the configure file. But you should use the rel

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-08 Thread Bent Bisballe Nyeng
On 01/09/14 02:50, Pete Batard wrote: > It is my great pleasure to announce libusb-1.0.18 RC1, which marks the > long awaited merge-back of libusbx with libusb! That's great news. I'll start testing right away. > With this release candidate (and upcoming release), we are finally > consolidating t

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-08 Thread Nothing
I can not find the conifigure file -- Original -- From: "Pete Batard";; Date: Thu, Jan 9, 2014 09:50 AM To: "libusb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net"; Cc: "libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"; Subject: [Libusbx-devel] Annou

[Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-08 Thread Pete Batard
All, It is my great pleasure to announce libusb-1.0.18 RC1, which marks the long awaited merge-back of libusbx with libusb! With this release candidate (and upcoming release), we are finally consolidating the two projects back into one, as well as bringing the many bug fixes and new features o