On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Slightly off the original topic but perhaps still relevant...
> >
> > There are several Linux programs using libusb-0.1 that don't work with
> > libusb-compat. The reason is that they perform some or
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> Slightly off the original topic but perhaps still relevant...
>
> There are several Linux programs using libusb-0.1 that don't work with
> libusb-compat. The reason is that they perform some or all of their
> I/O using the usbfs API directly, r
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2013/9/7 Hans de Goede :
> > Well, alternatively we could document that libusb-compat uses atexit for
> > cleanup,
> > and that apps using it should either not access libusb from their own
> > atexit handlers,
> > or register their atexit handler aft
