Re: [Libusbx-devel] umask affects libusb_attach_kernel_driver()

2013-06-27 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi On 06/26/2013 09:17 PM, Chris Dickens wrote: > Yes, devtmpfs. Linux Kernel is 2.6.32-358 (RHEL6). Ok likely a kernel issue then. You should probably retry with a more recent kernel (ie try on a Fedora 18 install), and then file a bug either against the upstream kernel, or against RHEL-6. Rega

Re: [Libusbx-devel] umask affects libusb_attach_kernel_driver()

2013-06-26 Thread Chris Dickens
Yes, devtmpfs. Linux Kernel is 2.6.32-358 (RHEL6). Regards, Chris On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On 06/25/2013 11:27 PM, Chris Dickens wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have discovered that the libusb process's file mask affects how >> libusb_attach_kernel_driver() res

Re: [Libusbx-devel] umask affects libusb_attach_kernel_driver()

2013-06-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06/25/2013 11:27 PM, Chris Dickens wrote: > Hi, > > I have discovered that the libusb process's file mask affects how > libusb_attach_kernel_driver() restores the driver. In my particular case, I > am dealing with usblp, so the kernel enumerates /dev/usb/lpX device files. > The /dev/usb

[Libusbx-devel] umask affects libusb_attach_kernel_driver()

2013-06-25 Thread Chris Dickens
Hi, I have discovered that the libusb process's file mask affects how libusb_attach_kernel_driver() restores the driver. In my particular case, I am dealing with usblp, so the kernel enumerates /dev/usb/lpX device files. The /dev/usb folder is created and destroyed as necessary for the devices. W