Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-12 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > Nice. I just carried some simple tests under Mac OS X 10.9.1 (Mac > Mini 2011) and NetBSD 6.1.1 (VirtualBox VM) using libusbx-1.0.18-rc1 > and both are fine. > > For NetBSD, there are three known warnings about "dereferencing > type-punned po

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-11 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Pete Batard wrote: > All, > > It is my great pleasure to announce libusb-1.0.18 RC1, which marks the > long awaited merge-back of libusbx with libusb! > ... > To check the RC, you are invited to go http://libusb.info, and use the > Download menu, which should give y

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-09 Thread Pete Batard
Hi Joshua, On 2014.01.09 19:57, Joshua Blake wrote: > Change there -> here, since this is read on the new site (rather than an > email referencing it.) This will eliminate confusion about whether > you're referencing "this" site here (libusb.info ) > or the old site. Good poin

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-09 Thread Joshua Blake
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Pete Batard wrote: > libusb.info > Pete, First congrats on the merge. Small suggestion on this the new site: What happened to the old site? The old site is now obsolete. Please use *libusb.info *. All of the libusb development has moved th

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-09 Thread Pete Batard
On 2014.01.09 06:30, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: > How much difference will there be to libusbx-1.0.18 and libusb-1.0.18? As far as developers are concerned, no difference. > What I mean is; will the merge simply be a copy of the current libusbx > code to the libusb repository Yup. Just one extra

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-09 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2014/1/9 Nothing : > > I can not find the conifigure file Maybe that is because the real file name is configure and not conifigure? The archive libusb-1.0.18-rc1.tar.bz2 _DO_ contain the configure file. Of course the github repository do not contain the configure file. But you should use the rel

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-08 Thread Bent Bisballe Nyeng
On 01/09/14 02:50, Pete Batard wrote: > It is my great pleasure to announce libusb-1.0.18 RC1, which marks the > long awaited merge-back of libusbx with libusb! That's great news. I'll start testing right away. > With this release candidate (and upcoming release), we are finally > consolidating t

Re: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1

2014-01-08 Thread Nothing
I can not find the conifigure file -- Original -- From: "Pete Batard";; Date: Thu, Jan 9, 2014 09:50 AM To: "libusb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net"; Cc: "libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"; Subject: [Libusbx-devel] Announcing libusb-1.0.18-rc1 All, It