Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-1.0.def syntax error

2012-06-25 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.06.24 01:22, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > Just found out that Fedora 17 ships with the defact dllwrap with > their MinGW-w64 based toolchain (32bit and 64bit) and I have the > exact same problem when cross-building libusbx under Fedora. OK, then I don't think we have a choice. I just pushed your

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-1.0.def syntax error

2012-06-23 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Pete Batard wrote: >> On 2012.06.17 14:00, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > In any case, the modification is benign and will work > with different version of dlltool, so I think it is good > to change libusb

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-1.0.def syntax error

2012-06-18 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2012.06.17 14:00, Xiaofan Chen wrote: In any case, the modification is benign and will work with different version of dlltool, so I think it is good to change libusb-1.0.def. > > I'm still on the fence there. > > I'd rather wa

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-1.0.def syntax error

2012-06-18 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.06.17 14:00, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >>> In any case, the modification is benign and will work >>> with different version of dlltool, so I think it is good >>> to change libusb-1.0.def. I'm still on the fence there. I'd rather wait a few weeks and see if dlltool are going to fix this, as the

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-1.0.def syntax error

2012-06-17 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> > Bug report to dlltool (actually invalid as pointed by Kai). >> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 >> >> On the other hand, Ruben disagreed with Kai and he >> thinks that the library name is optional.

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-1.0.def syntax error

2012-06-17 Thread Peter Stuge
Xiaofan Chen wrote: > > Bug report to dlltool (actually invalid as pointed by Kai). > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258 > > On the other hand, Ruben disagreed with Kai and he > thinks that the library name is optional. This is not a subjective matter. MS is the authoritative

Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusb-1.0.def syntax error

2012-06-17 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > I found a strange error when building libusbx with newer version of > the dlltool. As per this thread, it is the syntax error of libusb-1.0.def > which caused the problem. > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.w64.general/5141 > > I