On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:33 AM, therau2000 wrote:
> Sorry for previous message: link was not sent properly.
Firstly it is better that you start a new thread for this.
> Since you are indeed very knowledgeable on the subject and seem to be a
> great Mac Fan, tell me:
I am not really that a Mac F
Sorry for previous message: link was not sent properly.
Since you are indeed very knowledgeable on the subject and seem to be a
great Mac Fan, tell me:
is technically feasible to implement what is described here
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/DeviceDrivers/Conceptual/Clas
Since you are indeed very knowledgeable on the subject and seem to be a
great Mac Fan, tell me:
is technically feasible to implement what is described here on the Mac
as the Linux equivalent
libusb_detach_kernel_driver/libusb_attach_kernel_driver?
I know all about the kext approach but it is NOT
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Orin Eman wrote:
> Yes, Microsoft lose a selling point there. Why buy a Windows 8 machine now
> when you can get a Mac from Apple and not have to deal with a bunch of new,
> simplistic blocky apps? But Microsoft wanted their own app store and just
> had to have it
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Pete Batard wrote:
> > Last time I tried with VS2012, it seemed to produce ARM binaries
> > alright, but since Microsoft decided to go all Apple in terms of pricing
> > and control of RT hardware, I doubt there's going to be much point
> > try
Pete Batard wrote:
> Last time I tried with VS2012, it seemed to produce ARM binaries
> alright, but since Microsoft decided to go all Apple in terms of pricing
> and control of RT hardware, I doubt there's going to be much point
> trying to test on a closed/defective by design platform...
This
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> As to RT, I'll just point that it's possible to compile libusbx for ARM [3].
> Last time I tried with VS2012, it seemed to produce ARM binaries
> alright, but since Microsoft decided to go all Apple in terms of pricing
> and control of RT hardw
Nice report. As expected, Microsoft tightened the screw further with
regards to "security" and signed drivers. Obviously, I'm pleased the
Windows 8 cat signing issue was sorted by libwdi before it became a real
world issue.
Note that I'm also one of the few who purchased Windows 8 and actually
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> Now that Windows 8 and Windows RT have been released to the
>> general public and new computers/tablets/hybirds are being
>> released with Win8 and WinRT as the OS. It will be interesting
>> to see how libusbx work under W
Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Since WDK 8 will not support Windows on ARM (WinRT) driver
> development, I am not so sure how many vendors will really
> support WinRT, especially for small device vendors who
> want to leverage things like generic HID, no change that
> will work now.
Yes. For now, if you w
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> Right now I assume libusbx will not work under Windows RT.
>
> Right, and it never will. You cannot run standard Win32 applications or
> DLLs in Windows RT at all. The APIs are blocked. Unless you get
> special blessing
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Now that Windows 8 and Windows RT have been released to the
> general public and new computers/tablets/hybirds are being
> released with Win8 and WinRT as the OS. It will be interesting
> to see how libusbx work under Windows 8.
>
I just got t
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> Now that Windows 8 and Windows RT have been released to the
>> general public and new computers/tablets/hybirds are being
>> released with Win8 and WinRT as the OS. It will be interesting
>> to see how libusbx work under W
Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Now that Windows 8 and Windows RT have been released to the
> general public and new computers/tablets/hybirds are being
> released with Win8 and WinRT as the OS. It will be interesting
> to see how libusbx work under Windows 8.
It shouldn't be an issue at all. Internally, W
14 matches
Mail list logo
