Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> >> ok pete i tryed it again,
> >> got a bit of a different message, but still failed.
>
> Also since you are using Cygwin which has its older libusb-1.0,
> you may want to remove the older libusb-1.0 cygwin package
I've helped Dan with this a bit. The ubertooth package and a
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2012.05.18 15:23, dan wrote:
>> ok pete i tryed it again,
>> got a bit of a different message, but still failed.
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/6utL3N9N
Also since you are using Cygwin which has its older libusb-1.0,
you may want to remove the
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:27 AM, dan wrote:
> after noon guys im trying to port the ubertooth over to windows and get it
> working properly.
> im running into a bit of a snag though.
>
> gcc ubertooth-dump.c ubertooth.c -o ubertooth-dump -llibusb-1.0 -lbtbb
This does not seem to be correct, I th
On 2012.05.18 18:46, dan wrote:
> "•12:40PM• Our code compiles fine with libusb 1.0. That's
> what we support. If libusbx doesn't support the libusb 1.0 API, then
> forget it."
Libusbx does support the 1.0 API.
Currently, unless you're using one of the calls that only libusbx
provides, which
"•12:40PM• Our code compiles fine with libusb 1.0. That's what
we support. If libusbx doesn't support the libusb 1.0 API, then forget it."
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> If you send a request for help to a mailing list, please try to always
> reply to the mailing list
If you send a request for help to a mailing list, please try to always
reply to the mailing list (libusbx-devel), rather than just the person
who answered your post. Else you are:
1. restricting the number of people who can provide help to just that
person, and cutting out other people who might
On 2012.05.18 01:27, dan wrote:
> after noon guys im trying to port the ubertooth over to windows and get
> it working properly.
Nice.
> gcc ubertooth-dump.c ubertooth.c -o ubertooth-dump -llibusb-1.0 -lbtbb
> ubertooth.c: In function ‘stream_rx_usb’:
> ubertooth.c:124:4: warning: passing argume
