On 03/03/13 00:59, Pete Batard wrote:
> Final patch for the WinCE integration (should be applied after the
> previous one).
>
> Besides the copyright update, the main goal was to remove #ifdefs that
> could be avoided, which hopefully will help improve code readability.
>
> This was tested on bot
On 27/02/13 23:15, Pete Batard wrote:
> For your consideration. This is part of the WinCE cleanup I mentioned
> some time ago.
Thank you for taking the time to do that. It certainly does simplify things.
>
> While this is impacts a whole bunch of files, but it's mostly cleanup,
> and I tested c
On 2013.03.04 14:16, Toby Gray wrote:
> All looks fine to me. Sorry for not getting the copyright in the right
> format with the initial submission.
No worries. That's minor stuff, which I also didn't pay much attention
to when you submitted the patch.
Regards,
/Pete
--
On 2013.03.04 14:38, Toby Gray wrote:
> Why winsock.h and not winsock2.h?
Simple. I tried winsock2 and got plenty of conflicts.
And since I didn't have time to invest resolving them, I went with winsock.
> Does the WDK only include winsock.h?
Last time I checked, I think all the Windows platform
PS: I have now pushed both patches
/Pete
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_
On 2013.03.03 14:45, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Indeed it works better when going back to older version. Still that
> older version failed to get the Extended Properties OS Feature Descriptor.
Have you tried using os_fd[i].recipient for both requests? Simply
reverting the patch will not do, as there i
Just read this in the linux-usb list and I think
this might be useful for some people here.
Regards,
Xiaofan
- Forwarded message --
From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/gadget: beautify code, delete unused code
If you want, I have
