Hi,
On 04/11/2013 05:20 PM, Toby Gray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been looking into the performance of the Windows desktop and Windows CE
> versions of libusbx compared to Linux on the same hardware. The event
> handling in Windows and Windows CE appears to take considerably longer than
> for Linux.
On 11/04/13 22:44, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2013.04.11 12:18, Toby Gray wrote:
I will modify the bwince.cmd that I send previously
Ah sorry, I completely missed that one, along with your SF id.
You should now have the rights to upload and modify files in the
SourceForge download area.
That worke
On 11/04/13 18:17, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Toby Gray wrote:
>> We've been looking into the performance of the Windows desktop and
>> Windows CE versions of libusbx compared to Linux on the same hardware.
>> The event handling in Windows and Windows CE appears to take
>> considerably longer than for Li
using libusbx-1.0.14 and libftdi (the problem is similar with
1.0.15-rc3) downloaded from http://mcuee.blogspot.fr/ (Xiaofan's blog _
the devKit)
here's a report of a user that run Vista 32bits
C:\users\...\bin>find_all.exe
Number of FTDI devices found: 1
Checking device: 0
ftdi_usb_get_strings
Hi,
On 12/04/13 12:49, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> On 04/11/2013 05:20 PM, Toby Gray wrote:
>>
>> I see two possible ways of approaching the problem:
>>
>> 1) Add a new type, libusb_event_handle, which either maps to an FD or
>> a HANDLE, as appropriate on each platform. I've attached a first
>> at
On 12/04/13 00:27, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2013.04.11 16:20, Toby Gray wrote:
>> Rather than trying to optimise how the fake fds are generated and
>> handled, I think the best thing to do is to add improved APIs to improve
>> event handling on platforms which don't have fds and then change the
>> i
Toby Gray wrote:
> The only numbers which would probably make sense to others are that we
> noticed that there was a long time between the short packet of the end
> of a transfer and the host issuing the next IN token for that endpoint.
> The gap is multiple milliseconds in length on WinCE, but
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 PM, nico wrote:
> using libusbx-1.0.14 and libftdi (the problem is similar with 1.0.15-rc3)
> downloaded from http://mcuee.blogspot.fr/ (Xiaofan's blog _ the devKit)
> here's a report of a user that run Vista 32bits
> C:\users\...\bin>find_all.exe
> Number of FTDI dev
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Toby Gray wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't realise it was a common discussion point. I was trying
> to avoid doing what I did with the WinCE backend of going ahead and
> implementing something and only talking to the community when it
> was done.
Yes I think this is a go
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 PM, nico wrote:
>> using libusbx-1.0.14 and libftdi (the problem is similar with 1.0.15-rc3)
>> downloaded from http://mcuee.blogspot.fr/ (Xiaofan's blog _ the devKit)
>> here's a report of a user that run Vista
Hi
Le 13/04/13 05:40, Xiaofan Chen a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 PM, nico wrote:
>> using libusbx-1.0.14 and libftdi (the problem is similar with 1.0.15-rc3)
>> downloaded from http://mcuee.blogspot.fr/ (Xiaofan's blog _ the devKit)
>> here's a report of a user that run Vista 32bits
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo
