On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> Sorry for the false alarm. It seems to do with using WinZIP
>> to un-archive the tar.bz2 file. Using MSys utility sorted out
>> the issue. Normally I am using 7-zip and/or MSys utility
>>
Hi,
On 07/01/2013 11:45 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> Thanks for RC2, but did you forget to push your RC2 commit by any
> chance? The public git repo has neither the version.h update or the rc2 tag.
Yes I did, sorry. I know it was going to smoothly / already had the feeligng
I was forgetting something
Hi,
On 07/01/2013 07:07 PM, Paul Fertser wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:02:45PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Unaligned accesses on architectures which don't support it, either get
>> trapped and emulated (with a fat warnign logged somewhere), or get trapped
>> and terminate the program. So
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:52:17AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Thanks! I'll apply this to master once 1.0.16 is out the door. Note I plan to
> drop the __attribute__ ((aligned (2))), as we support compilers other then
> gcc.
I know but that's inside a comment and serves documentation purposes,
Hi,
On 07/02/2013 12:13 PM, Paul Fertser wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:52:17AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Thanks! I'll apply this to master once 1.0.16 is out the door. Note I plan to
>> drop the __attribute__ ((aligned (2))), as we support compilers other then
>> gcc.
>
> I know but th
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> You can find 1.0.16-rc2 docs including all the new API-s here:
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/libusb-reference/
One issue here:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/libusb-reference/group__hotplug.html
This does not men
On 2013.07.02 15:11, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> This does not mention that libusbx-1.0.16 will only support
> hotplug under Linux and Mac OS X. So probably it is
> good to fix the documentations.
I think what we probably want to do is indicate that before using
hotplug on a platform, you should check
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:02:45 +0200, Hans de Goede said:
>Unaligned accesses on architectures which don't support it, either get
>trapped and emulated (with a fat warnign logged somewhere), or get trapped
>and terminate the program. So I don't think this may cause "subtle" bugs.
>
>I do agree it cou
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 23:18:12 +0400, Paul Fertser said:
>On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:43:54PM -0400, Sean McBride wrote:
>> I don't think Paul's patch should be committed, at least not as-is.
>> It adds strange double casts (with no comment) that future readers
>> of the code will wonder about
>
>What
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:43:54PM -0400, Sean McBride wrote:
> I don't think Paul's patch should be committed, at least not as-is.
> It adds strange double casts (with no comment) that future readers
> of the code will wonder about
What else can a reader think of seeing a double cast via void*
(a
10 matches
Mail list logo
