Re: [Libva] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sample_c messages go faster on Haswell.

2015-01-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 03:15:39PM +0800, Xiang, Haihao wrote: > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 23:03 -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 02:39:36 PM Xiang, Haihao wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 21:54 -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 01:11:53

Re: [Libva] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sample_c messages go faster on Haswell.

2015-01-05 Thread Xiang, Haihao
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 23:03 -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 02:39:36 PM Xiang, Haihao wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 21:54 -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 01:11:53 PM Xiang, Haihao wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Kenneth, > > > > > > > > H

Re: [Libva] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sample_c messages go faster on Haswell.

2015-01-05 Thread Xiang, Haihao
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 14:39 +0800, Xiang, Haihao wrote: > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 21:54 -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 01:11:53 PM Xiang, Haihao wrote: > > > > > > Hi Kenneth, > > > > > > How did you test OSD ? I can't reproduce the issue you mentioned, OSD > > > wor

Re: [Libva] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sample_c messages go faster on Haswell.

2015-01-05 Thread Xiang, Haihao
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 21:54 -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 01:11:53 PM Xiang, Haihao wrote: > > > > Hi Kenneth, > > > > How did you test OSD ? I can't reproduce the issue you mentioned, OSD > > works well for me when using mplayer-vaapi with the latest > > libva/libv

Re: [Libva] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sample_c messages go faster on Haswell.

2015-01-05 Thread Xiang, Haihao
Hi Kenneth, How did you test OSD ? I can't reproduce the issue you mentioned, OSD works well for me when using mplayer-vaapi with the latest libva/libva-intel-driver master branch. I tried your patch, what surprised me is OSD still works well after applying your patch. It seems your patch didn't

Re: [Libva] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sample_c messages go faster on Haswell.

2015-01-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 04:23:00PM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > Haswell significantly improved the performance of sampler_c messages, > but the optimization appears to be off by default. Later platforms > remove this bit, and apparently always enable the optimization. > > Improves performance

Re: [Libva] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sample_c messages go faster on Haswell.

2014-11-04 Thread Xiang, Haihao
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 13:48 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:27:33AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:57:04PM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > > > Before we get too much further...we should check if libva is actually > > > broken. > > > I don't know

Re: [Libva] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sample_c messages go faster on Haswell.

2014-11-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:27:33AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:57:04PM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > > Before we get too much further...we should check if libva is actually > > broken. > > I don't know if this means the sampler palette completely doesn't work, or >