2014-05-14 11:04 GMT+02:00 Gwenole Beauchesne gb.de...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2014-05-12 8:17 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com:
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 23:31 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
2014-05-12 7:21 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com:
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:35 -0600,
Hi,
2014-05-12 8:17 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com:
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 23:31 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
2014-05-12 7:21 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com:
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:35 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
2014-05-12 2:55 GMT+02:00 Zhao
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 08:34 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Drop the optimization whereby surfaces that are no longer marked as
reference and that were already displayed are to be destroyed. This
is wrong mainly for two reasons:
1. The surface was displayed... once but it may still be
Hi,
2014-05-12 2:55 GMT+02:00 Zhao Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com:
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 08:34 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Drop the optimization whereby surfaces that are no longer marked as
reference and that were already displayed are to be destroyed. This
is wrong mainly for two reasons:
Hi,
2014-05-12 7:21 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com:
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:35 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
2014-05-12 2:55 GMT+02:00 Zhao Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com:
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 08:34 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Drop the optimization whereby surfaces
Drop the optimization whereby surfaces that are no longer marked as
reference and that were already displayed are to be destroyed. This
is wrong mainly for two reasons:
1. The surface was displayed... once but it may still be needed for
subsequent operations like displaying it again, using it
