Yes, correct.
-Original Message-
From: Libva [mailto:libva-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Holger
Kaelberer
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 1:31 AM
To: libva@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Libva] VPP Deinterlacing problem
Hi
On 05/16/2014 06:36 PM, Steven Toth wrote:
>
Hi
On 05/16/2014 06:36 PM, Steven Toth wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Zhao, Halley wrote:
>>> Question: Does Motion Adaption implementation (unlike Bob) require two
>>> distinct source surfaces plus an ADDITIONAL surface for the result?
>> Yes. A new surface is required for the resul
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Zhao, Halley wrote:
>> Question: Does Motion Adaption implementation (unlike Bob) require two
>> distinct source surfaces plus an ADDITIONAL surface for the result?
> Yes. A new surface is required for the result surface.
Thanks. Just to be clear, the resulting
g] On Behalf Of
> Steven Toth
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 11:57 PM
> To: libva@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Libva] VPP Deinterlacing problem
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for some help/guidance on implementing Motion Adaptive
> deinterlacing.
>
> Backgr
Hi,
I'm looking for some help/guidance on implementing Motion Adaptive
deinterlacing.
Background: I'm working on a libva project that receives raw video
frames (720x480i) from a video4linux SD video capture device, largely
based around the test example projects. Intel IvyBridge platform, i965
dri
