On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:34:10AM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
Hi Daniel
Hi Masayuki,
I understood your suggestion.
Therefore, I decline applying this patch.
[...]
I'm afraid that patch - even if limited to virsh - is unfortunately not
a good idea, as usual the preferred way would
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:24:27AM +0900, Masayuki Sunou wrote:
Hi
Because the value of XEN_V2_OP_SETMAXMEM in xen_internal.c is wrong, virsh
setmaxmem outputs error message.
-- Both XEN_V2_OP_SETMAXMEM and XEN_V2_OP_GETVCPUINFO are set to 14, but
XEN_V2_OP_SETMAXMEM should be set to
I'm not sure if this is the right way to solve this, but it is a way.
Rich.
Index: qemud/qemud.c
===
RCS file: /data/cvs/libvirt/qemud/qemud.c,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -r1.34 qemud.c
--- qemud/qemud.c 22 Mar 2007 18:30:57
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:39:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right way to solve this, but it is a way.
we should test the return value to check for an error there, the
unfortunate thing is that since we are in a signal handler there isn't
much we can do, I
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:39:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right way to solve this, but it is a way.
we should test the return value to check for an error there, the
unfortunate thing is that since we are in a signal handler there
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:22:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:39:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right way to solve this, but it is a way.
we should test the return value to check for an error there,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:48:41PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
David Lutterkort wrote:
I noticed that the guest capabilities on a xen dom0 always contain both
the pae and nonpae feature - AFAIK, you can't mix pae/nonpae guests and
hosts, and only one of the features should be there.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:22:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:39:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right way to solve this, but it is a way.
we should test the return value to check for an error there,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:24:57PM -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
I noticed that the guest capabilities on a xen dom0 always contain both
the pae and nonpae feature - AFAIK, you can't mix pae/nonpae guests and
hosts, and only one of the features should be there.
So it turned out to be a bit
While trying to verify any potential problem between with libvirt Xen
PPC port. I've found that libvirt currently in CVS attempts to determine
what hypercall version to follow, by looking at the hypervisior version.
It determines that this is some arbitrary versioning v2 of the
hypercall api.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:39:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:24:57PM -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
I noticed that the guest capabilities on a xen dom0 always contain both
the pae and nonpae feature - AFAIK, you can't mix pae/nonpae guests and
hosts, and
11 matches
Mail list logo
