[Libvir] [PATCH] About remote operation restrictions of a general user

Hi When I use virt-connect in a general user, and a general user can perform operation system such as start. So, here's the patch adds to can't use operation system in connect in a general user. Signed-off-by: Shigeki Sakamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Shigeki Sakamoto. Index: src/virsh.c

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] Fix substitution of QEMUD_PID_FILE

Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Are we good to commit this patch and the preceeding one (adding help to libvirt qemu daemon)? They both look good to me. OK, so no one else objected and they both seemed pretty uncontroversial, so

[Libvir] Re: [PATCH] add scheduler type.

Atsushi SAKAI wrote: Hi, This patch intends Scheduler related API and its 1/3 of Dan Suggested. It adds scheduler type API for libvirt. Other functions like scheduler parameter show and handle are plan to make. This patch includes virsh dominfo can see the scheduler type It can be seen if you

[Libvir] Re: [PATCH] add scheduler type.

Atsushi SAKAI wrote: [...] Actually there's another point. Can you try out the Xen unified patch + Dan's fixes[1][2] and see if they work for you? I notice that your patch depends on the current libvirt.c multiple-driver behaviour. Rich. [1]

[Libvir] Re: [PATCH] add scheduler type.

Hi, Rich Thank you for your comments. I am not checked with your Dan patch. I just checked with latest revision. I will check scheduler_get_set_parameter patch with above patch before posting. I hope I plan to post within this week. Thanks Atsushi SAKAI Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] About remote operation restrictions of a generaluser

Hi, Daniel This issue should be based on libvirt Authorization Model. I do not know libvirt Authorization model. How do you think? or any document exists? Or should be discuss libvirt Authorization Model later? Thanks Atsushi SAKAI Daniel Veillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 04,

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] About remote operation restrictions of a generaluser

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:33:53PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: Hi, Daniel This issue should be based on libvirt Authorization Model. I do not know libvirt Authorization model. How do you think? or any document exists? Or should be discuss libvirt Authorization Model later? Well

Re: [Libvir] Unified Xen patch (third and hopefully final version)

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:19:52AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: This is the third version of the unified Xen driver patch[1]. It includes Dan's fixes[2] and a minor fix of my own to fix compiles --without-xen. I've checked this and I'm happy with proposing it for inclusion in

Re: [Libvir] Unified Xen patch (third and hopefully final version)

For better or worse, that has been committed to CVS. Rich. -- Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/ 64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF Mobile: +44 7866 314 421 Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE,

[Libvir] Virtual network iptables rules

Warning, this is a long complicated email with lots of horrible details :-) I've long been a little confused with the way iptables bridging interacts, so set out to do some experiments. I added a -j LOG rule to every single chain in both the filter nat tables, and then tried various traffic