Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
- Linux/Solaris Xen - hypercalls
- Linux non-Xen - libnuma
- Solaris non-Xen - liblgrp
The Xen Linux modelling seems reasonably similar IIRC, but Solaris is
a slightly different representational approach.
The Solaris approach seems to be fully hierarchical
I'm reviving this old thread to give you all an update.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.libvirt/826
I've been working on parted for some time now,
http://git.debian.org/?p=parted/parted.git;a=summary
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.parted.devel
and have just
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:08:12PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
- Linux/Solaris Xen - hypercalls
- Linux non-Xen - libnuma
- Solaris non-Xen - liblgrp
The Xen Linux modelling seems reasonably similar IIRC, but Solaris is
a slightly different
Jim Meyering wrote:
[...]
Thanks for looking into this.
In addition, there is the fact that Parted's partition-table (aka
what it calls label) support is currently tied to a 512-byte sector
size for many label types. BTW, do any of you know which are the
partition types that matter the most
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:50:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
[...]
Thanks for looking into this.
In addition, there is the fact that Parted's partition-table (aka
what it calls label) support is currently tied to a 512-byte sector
size for many label types.
Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
From the virt-manager/libvirt p.o.v. it seems to me the important
operations are:
(1) Find attached drives.
(2) Find partitions available their sizes.
(3) Allocate logical volumes.
(4) Find out how much free space is available on a
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:55:33PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
From the virt-manager/libvirt p.o.v. it seems to me the important
operations are:
(1) Find attached drives.
(2) Find partitions available their sizes.
(3) Allocate
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And (4) can be done by libvirtd using ordinary POSIX calls, so no
external library support is needed, just some work to remote those
operations (which is mostly done).
Isn't doing #4 portably pretty tricky? There's still too much
variation,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:16:21PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And (4) can be done by libvirtd using ordinary POSIX calls, so no
external library support is needed, just some work to remote those
operations (which is mostly done).
Isn't
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:16:21PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And (4) can be done by libvirtd using ordinary POSIX calls, so no
external library support is needed, just some work to remote those
operations (which is mostly
Hi all,
This is the first of 10 or 11 patches I'll be submitting
which gets libvirt compiling/working on a Solaris dom0.
Also some minor generic bug fixing..
Sorry it took me so long from the Xen Summit..
Starting with a very simple one. :-) As I test them
on the cvs tree on Fedora, I'll
this fixes a null pointer dereference in printf on a DEBUG build.
Mark
null-string-ptr
Description: Binary data
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
This handles net-list, etc. a little more gracefully for Xen.
Mark
nonet
Description: Binary data
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
This one may be a little contentious...
This patch does a couple of things... It won't let you
set memory if the value is greater that maxmem.
It also will lower memory if max memory is set
to less than memory.
I think it's a good argument that this checking
should be in the hypervisor control
This patch is probably not correct. I wasn't sure how to handle
I18N in libvirt.
Had a request to add an error message for setvcpus domain 0.
This patch prints an error message for that case.
Mark
setvcpu-fixes
Description: Binary data
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's
extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's
part of an int).
Instead of printing out the wrong value, just display
major.minor in virsh.
Mark
version-fix
Description: Binary data
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Another requested error message. This prints out a message
if the vcpuinfo failed because the domain was shutdown.
same comment as previous patch about I18N.
Mark
getvcpu-fix
Description: Binary data
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
This patch has the includes need to build on Solaris.
I've been using ifdef linux ifndef linux to distinguish
between solaris and linux at this point.
I'm not sure what the preference is...
MRJ
solaris-headers
Description: Binary data
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:11:54PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
this fixes a null pointer dereference in printf on a DEBUG build.
+1, ACK
Dan
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:23:38PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
This handles net-list, etc. a little more gracefully for Xen.
I'm not so sure about this one.
a. Xen does have support for net-list which is currently done via the
(badly named) libvirt_qemud daemon. Though the network stuff
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:45:49PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
This one may be a little contentious...
This patch does a couple of things... It won't let you
set memory if the value is greater that maxmem.
It also will lower memory if max memory is set
to less than memory.
Yeah, that's a
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:55:14PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
This patch is probably not correct. I wasn't sure how to handle
I18N in libvirt.
What you've done there is correct. The build process extracts any strings
marked with _(...) and puts them into the .pot files. We push these out
to
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:07:36PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
This is the first of 10 or 11 patches I'll be submitting
which gets libvirt compiling/working on a Solaris dom0.
Also some minor generic bug fixing..
Thanks, it's too late for me to go through them, but I will
look
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's
extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's
part of an int).
Instead of printing out the wrong value, just display
major.minor in virsh.
Hmm, so with
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:12:15PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
Another requested error message. This prints out a message
if the vcpuinfo failed because the domain was shutdown.
same comment as previous patch about I18N.
Looks fine.
Regards,
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:23:38PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
This handles net-list, etc. a little more gracefully for Xen.
I'm not so sure about this one.
a. Xen does have support for net-list which is currently done via the
(badly
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:01:56PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
This is a little bigger of a patch. It has a couple of things in it.
First, in xen_internal.c and xs_internal.c have general dom0 support
for Solaris.
Again, using #ifdef/ifndef __linux__ to separate the logic.
I'm getting a
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:26:39PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
This patch has the includes need to build on Solaris.
I've been using ifdef linux ifndef linux to distinguish
between solaris and linux at this point.
Looks ok aside from
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:05:49PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:26:39PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
This patch has the includes need to build on Solaris.
I've been using ifdef linux ifndef linux to distinguish
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:05:33AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm curious as to what the changes for bootloader / kernel are for ?
Surely you always have either a bootloader, or a kenrel present in
the SEXPR ? So I'm not sure why its neccessary to disable the check
No, this is not true,
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:01:56PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
This is a little bigger of a patch. It has a couple of things in it.
First, in xen_internal.c and xs_internal.c have general dom0 support
for Solaris.
Again, using
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
There is a conflict with _N() in Solaris.
Hmm, not entirely sure what I was thinking of when I chose _N anyway, it
looks like N_ is the more common standard. Would using N_
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:21:09AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:05:33AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm curious as to what the changes for bootloader / kernel are for ?
Surely you always have either a bootloader, or a kenrel present in
the SEXPR ? So I'm not
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:07:09PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
http://cvs.sv.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnulib/lib/fsusage.c?root=gnulibview=markup
Unfortunately we can't use that. The license is GPL, while libvirt needs
to be LGPL :-(
Ugh. That,
Hi Dan
Hmm, I strongly suspect one (or more) of the commands in this series
of steps is missing a call for virDomainFree(). Every individual
virsh command should be freeing all the objects it has open (aside
fromthe virConnectPtr), so the cache of virDomainPtr objects ought
to be empty for
On 6/14/07, Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
There is a conflict with _N() in Solaris.
Hmm, not entirely sure what I was thinking of when I chose _N anyway, it
looks
On 6/14/07, Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a little confused about the xen_internal.c changes for the
hypercalls.
This is chunk:
Yeah, another funcky diff.. I'll send a different diff for this file
later tonight. I'm managing the changes out of a hg mq gate.
@@ -38,6
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:02:16AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm curious as to what the changes for bootloader / kernel are for ?
Surely you always have either a bootloader, or a kenrel present in
the SEXPR ? So I'm not sure why its neccessary to disable the check
No, this is
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:26:36AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:02:16AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm curious as to what the changes for bootloader / kernel are for ?
Surely you always have either a bootloader, or a kenrel present in
the SEXPR ? So I'm
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:20:19AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Well to give some form of indication as to how the guest is being booted.
Perhaps rather than making up a default path, just an empty bootloader/
element would work. The semantics being launch with the default bootloader
for
40 matches
Mail list logo
