On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:16:38PM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:36:05PM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
> > > I think appending unrelated data to the migration image is a bit of a
> > > hack anyway. A better plan would be a file containing
> > >
> >
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:36:05PM -0400, Jim Paris wrote:
> > I think appending unrelated data to the migration image is a bit of a
> > hack anyway. A better plan would be a file containing
> >
>
> Hum, beware you then need to make sure that you indicate in the
>
