On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:03:15PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
>
> I've broken this patch up into a few pieces to make
> it more reviewable and tried to address the comments
> from the previous patch (Jun 15th'ish if your looking).
>
> Here is first part...
I've comitted this minus the changes to
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 06:10:40AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:12:41PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Latest XenD allows for default bootloader to be used if one is not defined
> > for a paravirt OS. libvirt doesn't currently cope with this (see Solaris
> > thre
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:26:06AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
>
> I've cleaned up the patch from the previous comments...
> Sorry I'm off the original thread, switched over to mutt
> and am waiting for fetchmail to catch up with gmail..
>
> tested on today's CVS bits on a FC7 dom0
> (LD_PRELOAD
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:12:41PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Latest XenD allows for default bootloader to be used if one is not defined
> for a paravirt OS. libvirt doesn't currently cope with this (see Solaris
> thread), since it requires either a bootloader or kernel to always be
> prese
