Re: [libvirt] Support for passing arbitrary qemu/kvm admin console commands?

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:47:52PM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote: > I'm looking at building a framework which makes use of KVM's > pseudo-migration support for snapshot management. To my knowledge, this > functionality is not presently available through libvirt. > > Is it possible to send arbitrary

[libvirt] Support for passing arbitrary qemu/kvm admin console commands?

I'm looking at building a framework which makes use of KVM's pseudo-migration support for snapshot management. To my knowledge, this functionality is not presently available through libvirt. Is it possible to send arbitrary qemu/kvm admin console commands to a VM started and controlled by libv

[libvirt] [PATCH] kvm 32bit guest on 64bit host

Hi, I want to manage a 32 bit i686 guest on an x86_64 host with kvm and libvirt. KVM is perfectly capable of doing this (look e.g. at http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Guest_Support_Status) but libvirt did not allow it. So I created the attached patch to allow it and make it easy to extend the

Re: [libvirt] PATCH: Switch all remaining code to memory alloc APIs

"Daniel P. Berrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch switches all remaining code over to use the memory allocation > APIs, with exception of virsh which is going to be slightly more complex > > It was mostly a straight conversion - there were only a few places which > weren't checking for

Re: [libvirt] PATCH: Switch all remaining code to memory alloc APIs

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:49:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > --- a/src/xmlrpc.cFri May 30 10:36:42 2008 -0400 > > > +++ b/src/xmlrpc.cFri May 30 10:55:44 2008 -0400 > > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > > > > Hum

Re: [libvirt] PATCH: Switch all remaining code to memory alloc APIs

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:01:39PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > This patch switches all remaining code over to use the memory allocation > > APIs, with exception of virsh which is going to be slightly more complex > > > > I

Re: [libvirt] PATCH: Switch remote daemon to use memory alloc APIs

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:02:22AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:37:06PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > THis patch switches over the remote daemon to use the memory allocation > > APIs. This required exporting the 4 apis in the .so. I discovered along > > the way

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH]show the autostart status when displaya'virsh dominfo'.

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:03:15AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:39:36AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:18:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:21:05AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: > > > > Hi, Rich and Da

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH]show the autostart status when displaya'virsh dominfo'.

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:39:36AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:18:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:21:05AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: > > > Hi, Rich and Dan > > > > > > Thank you for fixing this. > > > I think it should be not

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH]show the autostart status when displaya'virshdominfo'.

Hi, Rich Thank you for your patch. The document discribes more detail than I expected :-). Thanks Atsushi SAKAI "Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:18:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:21:05AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wro

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH]show the autostart status when displaya'virsh dominfo'.

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:18:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:21:05AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: > > Hi, Rich and Dan > > > > Thank you for fixing this. > > I think it should be noted about submitting patch on HACKING file or others. > > How do you think? > > (