On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:47:52PM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
> I'm looking at building a framework which makes use of KVM's
> pseudo-migration support for snapshot management. To my knowledge, this
> functionality is not presently available through libvirt.
>
> Is it possible to send arbitrary
I'm looking at building a framework which makes use of KVM's
pseudo-migration support for snapshot management. To my knowledge, this
functionality is not presently available through libvirt.
Is it possible to send arbitrary qemu/kvm admin console commands to a VM
started and controlled by libv
Hi,
I want to manage a 32 bit i686 guest on an x86_64 host with kvm and libvirt.
KVM is perfectly capable of doing this (look e.g. at
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Guest_Support_Status) but libvirt did not
allow it.
So I created the attached patch to allow it and make it easy to extend the
"Daniel P. Berrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch switches all remaining code over to use the memory allocation
> APIs, with exception of virsh which is going to be slightly more complex
>
> It was mostly a straight conversion - there were only a few places which
> weren't checking for
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:49:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > > --- a/src/xmlrpc.cFri May 30 10:36:42 2008 -0400
> > > +++ b/src/xmlrpc.cFri May 30 10:55:44 2008 -0400
> > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >
> > Hum
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:13:42PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:01:39PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > This patch switches all remaining code over to use the memory allocation
> > APIs, with exception of virsh which is going to be slightly more complex
> >
> > I
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:02:22AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:37:06PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > THis patch switches over the remote daemon to use the memory allocation
> > APIs. This required exporting the 4 apis in the .so. I discovered along
> > the way
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:03:15AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:39:36AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:18:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:21:05AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> > > > Hi, Rich and Da
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:39:36AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:18:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:21:05AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> > > Hi, Rich and Dan
> > >
> > > Thank you for fixing this.
> > > I think it should be not
Hi, Rich
Thank you for your patch.
The document discribes more detail than I expected :-).
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
"Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:18:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:21:05AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wro
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:18:50PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:21:05AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> > Hi, Rich and Dan
> >
> > Thank you for fixing this.
> > I think it should be noted about submitting patch on HACKING file or others.
> > How do you think?
> > (
11 matches
Mail list logo