AS> May I commit this patch for MinGW compilation? veth.c is not
AS> necessary for MinGW.
Yep, looks okay to me :)
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpzuL9xSI6Jh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:48:17AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> Also remove a stale comment in the area. This makes libvirt compile when
> passed --with-lxc and --enable-compiler-warnings=error
Sure, also see other feedback from Atsushi Sakai,
thanks,
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
Also remove a stale comment in the area. This makes libvirt compile when
passed --with-lxc and --enable-compiler-warnings=error
diff -r bd08a3f22fb2 -r fa048279476d src/veth.c
--- a/src/veth.cThu Jun 26 16:09:48 2008 +
+++ b/src/veth.cFri Jun 27 06:48:10 2008 -0700
@@ -192,14
Daniel P. Berrange schreef:
It is what I proposed to be in libvirtd (native support for clouds), but
then implemented as a client application for libvirtd, that is a service
provider for avahi. And a webserver plugin for Cherokee that is a client
for avahi. Something as namespace collision prev
Hello, Dan Smith
Please check your moveInterfaceToNetNs on veth.c
**rc** and **len** have warning problem.
http://builder.virt-manager.org/logs/modules/libvirt--devel-build-output.log
P.S.
Many Dan stay in this mailing list.
Also My previous patch save this problem for general users
but not for
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:27:00PM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange schreef:
> >If I'm understanding what you're doing, it is sort of a REST style
> >web services API.
>
> Why is everyone using this REST buzzword lately? :D
Useful to distinguish from other web services APIs li
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:25:59AM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> Hello, Dan Smith
>
> May I commit this patch for MinGW compilation?
> veth.c is not necessary for MinGW.
That sounds fine to me at least,
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard
