On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:47:00AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:02:45AM -0400, Guido G?nther wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 04:17:30PM -0400, Guido Günther wrote:
attached is some basic support for host device passthrough. It enables
you to passthrough usb
Hi, Rich
Sorry for replying, I took 3-day holiday.
Thank you for noticing that.
I am intersted on that as autotest.
And, I already linked your page SIGs/MinGW page to
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/MinGW
(on cross compiling environment)
By the way, you already succeed to run virt-manager on
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:17:39AM -0400, Guido G?nther wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:47:00AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:02:45AM -0400, Guido G?nther wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 04:17:30PM -0400, Guido Günther wrote:
attached is some basic support
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 01:49:50PM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Are you disagreeing with the message (which your patch doesn't fix)
or with the semantic of the check (and then why allow to create a domain
reusing the UUID of another defined but not running domain, I can
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Updated to report only the first error, as suggested by Dan.
ACK. Looks good to me now
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o-
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 03:44:33PM -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
I think this is the voodoo.
1) Add the following lines to /etc/sysconfig/iptables in the OUTPUT
chain of the *filter table:
No, no, no no.
--insert FORWARD --destination 192.168.122.0/255.255.255.0
--out-interface virbr0
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:26:51PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
By the way, you already succeed to run virt-manager on cygwin?
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/win32-porting/
No - I couldn't get the libvirt Python module compiled. I'll
have another go once we've got MinGW in Fedora though.
Rich.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:05:56AM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
It appears that this patch was applied (in commit
45616162db2d1e807dbe70e60c67cb701cbd06d8) with the virDomainIsActive(vm)
checks removed from qemudDomainCreate, such that we fail out with
domain [...] is already defined and
Daniel Veillard wrote:
So the explicit port is output in XML if autoport is not set, or
if the domain is running.
Okay +1, push the patch :-)
Yes, I agree, I just tested out the patch and it seems to fix the issue for me.
I'm going to commit the patch now.
Chris Lalancette
--
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:34:48AM -0400, David Lively wrote:
Hi Folks -
I see Daniel Berrange submitted a SCSI HBA storage backend in March.
What ever happened to that? I'd be happy to pick this up if there's
more work to do (is there a code base later than the posted patch?)
One
Per subject; clarifies the distinction between virDomainCreateLinux and
virDomainDefineXML+virDomainCreate, and adds documentation for the
autoport display attribute.
diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
index 70b9c4a..7177965 100644
--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
Hi,
I am running XEN on an debian etch. For clustering purposes I wanted to
boot fedora as virtual machine.
That works (except for nfs mounts) fine using the paravortualization
features.
But fully virtulalized guests do not even boot, I do not get any
sensefull error message, my config file
I have answered my own question.
On an XEN kernel, the default hypervisor is XEN and I did not have any
XEN domains.
If I explicitly connect to QEMU - my programs work fine.
I discovered this fact by running the existing programs with
the connect string:
qemu://steve-1.verizon.net/system
I
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 05:53:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Updated to report only the first error, as suggested by Dan.
Code looks good, sorry for the delay +1
Maybe it would be better to confine all this libxml2 specific logic
as a couple of internal routines exported from
14 matches
Mail list logo
