On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:02:16AM -0700, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
Hey folks,
I got an android and wanted to set up an armel debian vm to test out
some code. I had to launch it directly with qemu-system-arm, though,
since virsh didn't have an arm option to select.
This is a patch
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:58:57PM +0100, Andreas Sommer wrote:
I'm still experimenting around with the vTPM patch, and I want to
install my version of libvirt on a Debian system - not in my $HOME
directory but on the default paths. I followed the autogen command below
and also did make
Hi,
Believe it is my bad. Didn't check this case when I fixed the problem related
to pools that were not correctly cleaned up when the create failed.
/Henrik
-Original Message-
From: libvir-list-boun...@redhat.com on behalf of Dave Allan
Sent: Wed 2009-07-01 16:02
To: Daniel P.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:19:57AM +0900, Satoru SATOH wrote:
This is a patch to make network schema (network.rng) to support some
neat features (/netowrk/domain, //dhcp/host/*).
Right, makes sense, applied and commited,
thanks !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:32:20AM +0900, Satoru SATOH wrote:
It seems that libvirt network driver can understand /network/domain
element but it does not save this configuration into the network
definition XML file correctly (looks completely forgetting about it).
Here is a fix for this
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:58:57PM +0100, Andreas Sommer wrote:
I'm still experimenting around with the vTPM patch, and I want to
install my version of libvirt on a Debian system - not in my $HOME
directory but on the default paths. I followed the autogen command below
and also did make
This patch adds cd and pwd commands to virsh. These can be useful
together with commands that refer to files in the local file systems,
especially save and restore.
I explicitly decided not to provide any other command, e.g. mkdir,
to avoid going down a slippery slope (now you want mkdir,
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
A topic on ksummit agenda is 'containers end-game and how do we
get there'.
So for starters, looking just at application (and system) containers, what do
the libvirt and liblxc projects want to see in kernel support that is currently
missing? Are there specific things
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:02:16AM -0700, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
Hey folks,
I got an android and wanted to set up an armel debian vm to test out
some code. I had to launch it directly with qemu-system-arm, though,
since virsh didn't have an arm option to select.
This is a
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:01:29AM -0700, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:02:16AM -0700, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
Hey folks,
I got an android and wanted to set up an armel debian vm to test out
some code. I had to launch it directly with qemu-system-arm,
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 18:27 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The reason the mips ones are separate, is that it had 2 separate
qemu binaries for each. If arm is all done by one binary what
you have is fine.
Yep, they're all handled with qemu-system-arm
--- ../libvirt-0.6.1/src/qemu_conf.c
Could we add cscope's files to .gitignore?
Dave
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1b36694..ca73a98 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ config.status
config.sub
configure
coverage
+cscope.files
+cscope.out
libtool
libvirt-*.tar.gz
libvirt.pc
--
Libvir-list
On 07/02/2009 03:17 PM, Dave Allan wrote:
Could we add cscope's files to .gitignore?
+1
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
13 matches
Mail list logo
