Jim Meyering wrote:
While this patch stays minimal by simply adding XZ/xz to the list,
I think it would be better to remove lzma, since it uses
an inferior format (which lacks an integrity check), and
has been effectively subsumed by xz.
Let me know if you'd like that, and I'll prepare the
Chris Lalancette wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
While this patch stays minimal by simply adding XZ/xz to the list,
I think it would be better to remove lzma, since it uses
an inferior format (which lacks an integrity check), and
has been effectively subsumed by xz.
Let me know if you'd like
Let me rephrase my question : )
In the current libvirt infrastructure I can do a lot of things with libvirt and
a remote ESX node
I can list all the guests
I can suspend a guest
I can get a lot of node info
and much more
can I (for example)
1. add NIC to a guest domain
2. list all the
Shahar Klein wrote:
Let me rephrase my question : )
In the current libvirt infrastructure I can do a lot of things with
libvirt and a remote ESX node
I can list all the guests
I can suspend a guest
I can get a lot of node info
and much more
can I (for example)
1. add NIC to a
Jim Meyering wrote:
Chris Lalancette wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
While this patch stays minimal by simply adding XZ/xz to the list,
I think it would be better to remove lzma, since it uses
an inferior format (which lacks an integrity check), and
has been effectively subsumed by xz.
Let me
Jim Meyering wrote:
At Chris' suggestion, I've added a comment warning not to do what I did ;-)
To make it even more obvious that these numbers matter,
I've assigned explicit constants in the enum:
+QEMUD_SAVE_FORMAT_RAW = 0,
+QEMUD_SAVE_FORMAT_GZIP = 1,
+
Jim Meyering wrote:
...
At Chris' suggestion, I've added a comment warning not to do what I did ;-)
To make it even more obvious that these numbers matter,
I've assigned explicit constants in the enum:
+QEMUD_SAVE_FORMAT_RAW = 0,
+QEMUD_SAVE_FORMAT_GZIP = 1,
+
thanks Chris
I'll try to write somthing
and see how it goes
shahar
From: Chris Lalancette clala...@redhat.com
To: Shahar Klein shaharkl...@yahoo.com
Cc: veill...@redhat.com; libvir-list@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 10:18:39 AM
Subject: Re:
2009/9/9 Shahar Klein shaharkl...@yahoo.com:
Let me rephrase my question : )
In the current libvirt infrastructure I can do a lot of things with libvirt
and a remote ESX node
I can list all the guests
I can suspend a guest
I can get a lot of node info
and much more
can I (for example)
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Chris Lalancette wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
While this patch stays minimal by simply adding XZ/xz to the list,
I think it would be better to remove lzma, since it uses
an inferior format (which lacks an
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 04:17:26PM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
Resubmitting based on feedback from this list. Notably, *alloc calls
have been removed and syntax-check completes without error for all
files.
Thanks ! I think this is an item for post 0.7.1, so most likely you
won't get much
I think I understand the mechanism of the VI API
and the way esx_vi.c is using it
the surounding is a bit more complex for me
so
can you provide the framework?
I mean
can you put in the esx_interface_driver.c and h
and the registration etc...
and also putting it all into the auto make
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:49:46AM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
diff --git a/src/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu_driver.c
index f64d70b..7b64712 100644
--- a/src/qemu_driver.c
+++ b/src/qemu_driver.c
@@ -3622,7 +3622,8 @@ enum
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:57:40AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hum, I realize that support of LZOP was added after 0.7.0, so we never
made a release with it (well except for git snapshot which may have been
pushed).
I wonder if the best is not to just drop the
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:17:48AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
...
At Chris' suggestion, I've added a comment warning not to do what I did ;-)
To make it even more obvious that these numbers matter,
I've assigned explicit constants in the enum:
+
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:57:40AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hum, I realize that support of LZOP was added after 0.7.0, so we never
made a release with it (well except for git snapshot which may have been
pushed).
I wonder if the best
2009/9/9 Shahar Klein shaharkl...@yahoo.com:
I think I understand the mechanism of the VI API
and the way esx_vi.c is using it
the surounding is a bit more complex for me
so
can you provide the framework?
I mean
can you put in the esx_interface_driver.c and h
and the registration etc...
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:17:48AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
...
At Chris' suggestion, I've added a comment warning not to do what I did ;-)
To make it even more obvious that these numbers matter,
I've assigned explicit constants in the enum:
Okay I found out what the problem was. I stumbled over the bug in the
creation of the Python interface that I filed some weeks ago
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518029).
Andreas Sommer wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with starting a HVM virtual machine on Xen-3.4
with
Thank you very much : )
From: Matthias Bolte matthias.bo...@googlemail.com
To: Shahar Klein shaharkl...@yahoo.com
Cc: Chris Lalancette clala...@redhat.com; libvir-list@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 1:11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [libvirt] Interface
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:57:40AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hum, I realize that support of LZOP was added after 0.7.0, so we never
made a release with it (well except for
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:57:40AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hum, I realize that support of LZOP was added after 0.7.0, so we never
made a release with
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
Hi!
My buildbot spotted a problem with the latest changes to Phyp, as the
function libssh2_session_block_directions() only is available with
libssh2 version 1.0 and later.
At least on Debian Lenny there is an older one
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
Hi!
My buildbot spotted a problem with the latest changes to Phyp, as the
function libssh2_session_block_directions() only is available with
libssh2 version 1.0 and later.
At least on Debian Lenny there
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:16:59PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Okay, I suggest the following patch removing the 2 extra compressors
and making sure the package including the daemon, if compiled with qemu
has the proper dependancies.
xz package dependancy is IMHO
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
If a file descriptor with events=0 was added to the libvirtd
event loop, it would still be added to the poll() fds' array.
While it wouldn't see any POLLIN/OUT events, it'd still get
triggered for
Anno domini 2009 Daniel Veillard scripsit:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
Hi!
My buildbot spotted a problem with the latest changes to Phyp, as the
function libssh2_session_block_directions() only is available with
libssh2 version 1.0 and later.
Charles Duffy wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hum, I realize that support of LZOP was added after 0.7.0, so we never
made a release with it (well except for git snapshot which may have been
pushed).
I wonder if the best is not to just drop the lzop option altogether
Jim Meyering wrote:
Good point about it being one of the fastest.
I shouldn't have mentioned the subjective popular.
Usefulness trumps that. I suppose Daniel, Cc'd, will decide.
Per off-list discussion with DV, I'm providing some numbers. Sort order
is space used on disk, lowest to highest,
[Pardon the repost -- fixed the table formatting in this version]
Jim Meyering wrote:
Good point about it being one of the fastest.
I shouldn't have mentioned the subjective popular.
Usefulness trumps that. I suppose Daniel, Cc'd, will decide.
Per off-list discussion with DV, I'm providing
From 3c4f6568623ed420a9e71da33b9ce74abda289a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Duffy charles_du...@dell.com
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:53:25 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Reintroduce support for lzop compression
lzop was removed due to some confusion over whether it provided functional
advantages
Hi,
This patch closes logfile fd after spawing qemu in qemudStartVMDaemon.
The fd seems to be closed in the error path, but not in the normal path.
The fd is passed to virExecDaemonize though, but looks not being closed
inside it. Eventually, the fd is never closed during libvirtd lifetime.
32 matches
Mail list logo
