Hello.
We notice a very upsetting behavior of how libvirtd deals with running domains
after being restarted.
Namely, in 10-20s after start libvirtd may accidentally kill a random number of
running (qemu) domains with SIGTERM.
Here is what we get in libvirt log:
2013-02-27 12:35:10.415+:
On 03/02/2013 04:35 AM, Igor Lukyanov wrote:
Hello.
We notice a very upsetting behavior of how libvirtd deals with running domains
after being restarted.
Namely, in 10-20s after start libvirtd may accidentally kill a random number of
running (qemu) domains with SIGTERM.
[...]
Specifically
Hey,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:20:56PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I have just tagged git and pushed the tarball. The rpms for F17
are at the usual place too:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
I gave a try to the set of rpms and this seems to work fine for
relatively simple tests.
On 03/02/2013 09:39 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
Sorry in advance for possible top-post, I`m not able to add proper
messageid here.
Does it ever occur if you don't run with DHCP snooping enabled?
Stefan
No, please disregard those errors. We don`t run DHCP snooping/IP
learning on interfaces
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Laine Stump la...@laine.org wrote:
On 02/28/2013 11:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:31:34AM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:24:17PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:16:37PM +,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/01/2013 03:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
So the conclusion is that I see no extra harm in calling nl_geterror(). ACK.
Except the API signature is different, so my patch won't work with
both versions :-(
Sounds
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:20:56PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I have just tagged git and pushed the tarball. The rpms for F17
are at the usual place too:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
I gave a try
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 12:30:10PM -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c b/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c
index f3b09cf..3ef3499 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c
@@
On 03/02/2013 01:30 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:20:56PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I have just tagged git and pushed the tarball. The rpms for F17
are at the usual place too:
On 03/02/2013 09:30 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:20:56PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
I have just tagged git and pushed the tarball. The rpms for F17
are at the usual place too:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
I gave a try to the set of rpms and this
Sorry in advance for possible top-post, I`m not able to add proper
messageid here.
Does it ever occur if you don't run with DHCP snooping enabled?
Stefan
No, please disregard those errors. We don`t run DHCP snooping/IP
learning on interfaces but only modified clean-traffic rules, current
Stefan,
qemu-1.1.2 with dfsg-5 patchset
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/q/qemu/qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-5.debian.tar.gz
for example
VM` xml is quite simple, qemu64 cpu model, pc-1.1 machine model, one
virtio disk, two bridged virtio NICs, serial and virtio-serial ptys.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at
12 matches
Mail list logo
