On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:52:57AM -0700, Anirban Chakraborty wrote:
V2:
Addressed comments raised in review of V1.
Consolidate calls to virNetDevBandwidthSet.
Clear bandwidth settings when the interface is detached or domain
destroyed.
V1:
Ethernet interfaces in libvirt currently do not support
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 15:58 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On 09/23/2014 06:04 AM, Chen Fan wrote:
> > if specifying migration_host to an Ipv6 address without brackets,
> > it was resolved to an incorrect address, such as:
> > tcp:2001:0DB8::1428:,
> > but the correct address should be:
> >
Thank you, Michal. I will read your comments carefully. It is great
examples for me to learn more about the project.
2014-10-03 16:48 GMT+08:00 Michal Privoznik :
> On 02.10.2014 05:30, Taowei wrote:
>
>> This seriers of patches rewrite the vbox network driver.
>>
>> Diff from v2:
>>*Seperate
Il 05/10/2014 14:48, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> In fact, if the pc_piix bits are dropped from the patch,
> you get a generic patchset that does exactly what you ask,
> correct?
>
> Downstream can then enable qemu-kvm compatibility by adding:
>
> -global cirrus-vga.vgamem_mb=16 -global pit-c
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 08:26:45AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > > If you were just objecting to the fact that pc-1.0 was made to
> > > > be an alias of either one or the other at compile time, simply
> > > > drop the second patch of the v2 patchset.
> > >
> > > I was objecting to making pc-1.
> > > If you were just objecting to the fact that pc-1.0 was made to
> > > be an alias of either one or the other at compile time, simply
> > > drop the second patch of the v2 patchset.
> >
> > I was objecting to making pc-1.0 special. There's nothing special in
> > pc-1.0, other machine types al
On 5 Oct 2014, at 08:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/09/2014 09:02, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>>> If you were just objecting to the fact that pc-1.0 was made to
>>> be an alias of either one or the other at compile time, simply
>>> drop the second patch of the v2 patchset.
>
> I was object
Il 29/09/2014 09:02, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>> If you were just objecting to the fact that pc-1.0 was made to
>> be an alias of either one or the other at compile time, simply
>> drop the second patch of the v2 patchset.
I was objecting to making pc-1.0 special. There's nothing special in
