Anybody can help with this problem?
El 31 dic. 2016 5:25 p. m., "Oscar Segarra"
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I just have two virtual machines in my environment, I want them to
> gracefully stop when host is powered off gracefully.
>
> Nevertheless, system hangs on shutdown:
>
>
ping ** 2
Thanks
John
On 12/15/2016 05:36 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
> On 12/06/2016 06:43 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Details in each patch - essentially trying to get "more correct" values.
>>
>> John Ferlan (2):
>> storage: Fix
ping?
Thanks -
John
(couple of bz's sprinkled in here too from previous postings - patch 2
and patch 10 dealing with NO_OVERWRITE)
On 12/15/2016 04:42 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> Two of these patches (2 and 10) are followups to no-overwrite patches
> previously posted (I left links in the
ping**3
Thanks
John
On 12/15/2016 05:35 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> ping?
>
> Thanks -
>
> John
>
> On 12/03/2016 09:06 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>> ping?
>>
>> Tks -
>>
>> John
>>
>> On 11/17/2016 09:55 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346566
>>>
>>> If
On 12/16/2016 11:24 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> For the blockjobs, where libvirt is able to track the state internally
> we can fix locking of images we can remove the appropriate locks.
>
> Also when doing a pivoting operation we should not acquire the lock on
> any of those images since both
On 12/16/2016 11:24 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Images that became the backing chain of the current image due to the
> snapshot need to be unlocked in the lock manager. Also if qemu was
> paused during the snapshot the current top level images need to be
> released until qemu is resumed so that
On 12/16/2016 11:24 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> The code at first changed the definition and then rolled it back in case
> of failure. This was ridiculous. Refactor the code so that the image in
> the definition is changed only when the snapshot is successful.
>
> The refactor will also simplify
On 12/16/2016 11:24 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Libvirt is able to properly model what happens to the backing chain
> after a snapshot so there's no real need to redetect the data.
> Additionally with the _REUSE_EXT flag this might end up in redetecting
> wrong data if the user puts wrong backing
On 01/07/2017 03:47 AM, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
> From: Chen Hanxiao
>
> s/rather then/rather than
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao
> ---
> tools/virsh.pod | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
ACK - trivial... Now pushed.
Tks,
On 12/19/2016 10:57 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik
> ---
> src/security/security_dac.c | 193
>
> 1 file changed, 193 insertions(+)
>
Might have been nice to add some basic/sparse documentation
On 12/19/2016 10:57 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> With our new qemu namespace code in place, the relabelling of
> devices is done not as good is it could: a child process is
> spawned, it enters the mount namespace of the qemu process and
> then runs desired API of the security driver.
Extra
On 12/19/2016 10:57 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> The code at the very bottom of the DAC secdriver that calls
> chown() should be fine with read-only data. If something needs to
> be prepared it should have been done beforehand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik
> ---
>
On 12/19/2016 10:57 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> It doesn't make much sense to have two different prefix for
> functions within the same driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik
> ---
> src/security/security_selinux.c | 26 +-
> 1 file changed,
From: Chen Hanxiao
s/rather then/rather than
Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao
---
tools/virsh.pod | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/virsh.pod b/tools/virsh.pod
index ef91223..e5c94e7 100644
--- a/tools/virsh.pod
14 matches
Mail list logo