On 22.12.2017 17:13, John Ferlan wrote:
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> Still adding the "virHashRemoveAll(dmn->servers);" into
>>> virNetDaemonClose doesn't help the situation as I can still either crash
>>> randomly or hang, so I'm less convinced this would really fix anything.
>>> It does change the
[...]
>>
>> Still adding the "virHashRemoveAll(dmn->servers);" into
>> virNetDaemonClose doesn't help the situation as I can still either crash
>> randomly or hang, so I'm less convinced this would really fix anything.
>> It does change the "nature" of the hung thread stack trace though, as
>>
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 07:23 PM +0100, John Ferlan wrote:
> On 12/21/2017 09:28 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
>> This patch series fixes some locking issues, a memory leak, some other
>> cosmetic changes, and it fixes a bug that led to a libvirtd which
>> doesn't accept new
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 07:20 PM +0100, John Ferlan wrote:
> On 12/21/2017 09:29 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
>> ...as there is an access to priv->sasl the priv->lock is needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer
>> Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:59:24AM -0700, Lin Fu wrote:
> > How are locks acquired by libdlm scoped ? The reason we have virtlockd is
> > that the fcntl() locks need to be held by a running process, and we wanted
> > them to persist across libvirtd restarts. This required holding them in a
> >
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:52:45AM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
>
>
> On 21.12.2017 15:14, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:48:44PM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 21.12.2017 11:49, Erik Skultety wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 09:39:16AM +0100,
From: zhangshengyu
---
docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 28 +
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 8
src/qemu/qemu_block.c | 24 ++-
src/qemu/qemu_command.c
On 21.12.2017 17:59, John Ferlan wrote:
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> Patch looks good to me too. But still original "libvirtd: fix crash on
>>> termination"
>>> fixes another issue and if applied fixes "virt-manager issue" as well as
>>> John
>>> figured out.
>
> Not sure there's enough coffee in the
v3:
use helper qemuDomainDelChardevTLSObjects and address some comments
v2:
rebased on master
Chen Hanxiao (2):
qemu: Add support for hot unplugging redirdev device which can use the
detach-device --live
news: add change of hot unplug redirdev
docs/news.xml | 11 ++
> How are locks acquired by libdlm scoped ? The reason we have virtlockd is
> that the fcntl() locks need to be held by a running process, and we wanted
> them to persist across libvirtd restarts. This required holding them in a
> separate process.
Locks are managed by 'dlm_controld' daemon.
On 21.12.2017 15:57, John Ferlan wrote:
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> So short story made really long, I think the best course of action will
>>> be to add this patch and reorder the Unref()'s (adminProgram thru srv,
>>> but not dmn). It seems to resolve these corner cases, but I'm also open
>>> to other
From: Chen Hanxiao
Add hot unplug redirdev in news 'Improvements' section
Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao
---
v3:
move it into 'Improvements' section
docs/news.xml | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/news.xml
From: Chen Hanxiao
We lacked of hot unplugging redirdev device.
This patch add support for it.
We could use detach-device --live now.
Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao
---
v3:
use helper qemuDomainDelChardevTLSObjects
address John's comments
v2:
13 matches
Mail list logo