Signed-off-by: Chris Jester-Young
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 2 ++
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 1 +
src/qemu/qemu_command.c| 4 +++-
src/qemu/qemu_validate.c | 9 -
On 5/8/20 8:06 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Expose the TPM Proxy support for PPC64 guests by creating a new
cap called QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_SPAPR_TPM_PROXY.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c| 2 ++
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
On 5/8/20 8:06 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
QEMU 4.1.0 introduced a new device type called TPM Proxy, currently
implemented by PPC64 guests via a new virtual device called
'spapr-tpm-proxy' (see QEMU 0fb6bd073230 for more info).
The TPM Proxy device interacts with a TPM Resource Manager,
On 5/8/20 5:39 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
(CCing Mike Roth since he implemented the QEMU support for this device)
On 5/8/20 5:18 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 5/8/20 8:06 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Hello,
This series implements a new device type for Libvirt called
"TPM Proxy".
(CCing Mike Roth since he implemented the QEMU support for this device)
On 5/8/20 5:18 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 5/8/20 8:06 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Hello,
This series implements a new device type for Libvirt called
"TPM Proxy". This device acts as a proxy for TPM requisitions
On 4/24/20 9:07 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
Add support for xl.cfg(5) pci device 'seize' option in
domXML-to-xenconfig converter. And a test for it.
It is functional equivalent of 'managed' attribute of a hostdev, so map
it directly.
This is fine for the converter. We'd never want to
On 4/24/20 9:07 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
Add support for xl.cfg(5) pci device 'permissive' option in
domXML-to-xenconfig converter. And a test for it.
Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
---
Changes in v2:
- new patch
---
src/libxl/xen_common.c | 51
On 4/24/20 9:07 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
From: Simon Gaiser
By setting the permissive flag the Xen guest access to the PCI config space
is not filtered. This might be a security risk, but it's required for
some devices and the IOMMU and interrupt remapping should (mostly?)
contain
On 5/8/20 8:06 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
QEMU 4.1.0 introduced a new device type called TPM Proxy, currently
implemented by PPC64 guests via a new virtual device called
'spapr-tpm-proxy' (see QEMU 0fb6bd073230 for more info).
The TPM Proxy device interacts with a TPM Resource Manager,
On 5/8/20 8:06 AM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Hello,
This series implements a new device type for Libvirt called
"TPM Proxy". This device acts as a proxy for TPM requisitions
that the guest can make for an existing TPM Resource Manager
in the host. The TPM Resource Manager multiplexes TPM
On 4/30/20 6:07 AM, Artur Puzio wrote:
gfx_passthru xl.cfg option enables GPU specific quirks required for working
Intel GPU passthru. Qemu (used for device model by xen) will refuse to start
a VM when an IGD is passed, but this option was not set in Xen.
Do we really need to expose this
Peter Krempa writes:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:54:25 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> This series extends QMP introspection to cover deprecation.
>> Additionally, new option -compat lets you configure what to do when
>> deprecated interfaces get used. This is intended for testing users of
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
---
docs/news.xml | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml
index 4cef804aac..21ee98c45b 100644
--- a/docs/news.xml
+++ b/docs/news.xml
@@ -44,6 +44,20 @@
+
+
+ qemu:
Expose the TPM Proxy support for PPC64 guests by creating a new
cap called QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_SPAPR_TPM_PROXY.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c| 2 ++
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h| 1 +
This patch wraps it up all the wiring done in previous patches,
enabling a PPC64 guest to launch a guest using a TPM Proxy
device.
Note that device validation is already being done in
qemu_validate.c, qemuValidateDomainDeviceDefTPMProxy(), on
domain define time. We don't need to verify QEMU
Add virDomainTPMProxyDefParseXML() and virDomainTPMProxyDefFormat()
to handle the creating of the TPM Proxy device via its XML
description.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
---
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 94 +-
1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 1
Add a new test to assert the QEMU command line being built
for the TPM Proxy device.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
---
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpmproxy.args | 28 ++
tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 4
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
create
QEMU 4.1.0 introduced a new device type called TPM Proxy, currently
implemented by PPC64 guests via a new virtual device called
'spapr-tpm-proxy' (see QEMU 0fb6bd073230 for more info).
The TPM Proxy device interacts with a TPM Resource Manager, a host
device capable of multiplexing the host TPM
This new device will be used to represent a single instance of a
TPM Proxy for the domain.
XML functions to parse and format the device from the XML definition
will be added in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
---
src/conf/domain_capabilities.c | 1 +
Update qemuxml2xmltest.c to add tests to validate the XML parsing
of the new TPM Proxy device type.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
---
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpmproxy.xml | 31 +
tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/ppc64-tpmproxy.xml | 37 +
Hello,
This series implements a new device type for Libvirt called
"TPM Proxy". This device acts as a proxy for TPM requisitions
that the guest can make for an existing TPM Resource Manager
in the host. The TPM Resource Manager multiplexes TPM access
to multiple processes, allowing more than one
Turns out that it's not enough to pass the qemu:///embed root to
virQEMUDriverConfigNew(), you also have to make sure the same
string is copied into the virQEMUDriver structure yourself, and
not doing so in our case resulted in the cleanup never happening
and in distcheck failing because of that.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:55 PM Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 5/7/20 8:37 AM, Han Han wrote:
> > Unlike the file based disk, NVME disk cannot be pre-created by libvirt.
> > So skip the step of pre-creation.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823639
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Han Han
On 08.05.2020 06:46, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 3/20/20 5:25 AM, nshirokovskiy wrote:
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> Some time ago I posted RFC [1] concerning an issue of unresponsive
>> libvird during restart if there is large
24 matches
Mail list logo
