[libvirt] [PATCH] implement BOOT_TIMEOUT

--- tools/libvirt-guests.init.sh |2 ++ tools/libvirt-guests.sysconf |3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/libvirt-guests.init.sh b/tools/libvirt-guests.init.sh index f247e5e..b462ea8 100644 --- a/tools/libvirt-guests.init.sh +++ b/tools/libvirt-guest

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] implement BOOT_TIMEOUT

Sorry for top posing. This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695653. Was filed first in Bugzilla because the mailing list wasn't accessible yesterday. На 13.04.2011 11:15, Alexander Todorov написа: --- tools/libvirt-guests.init.sh |2 ++ tools/libvirt-guests.sy

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] implement BOOT_TIMEOUT

На 13.04.2011 20:31, Eric Blake написа: On 04/13/2011 02:15 AM, Alexander Todorov wrote: --- tools/libvirt-guests.init.sh |2 ++ tools/libvirt-guests.sysconf |3 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/libvirt-guests.init.sh b/tools/libvirt

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] implement BOOT_TIMEOUT

Hello folks, here's a second try at this wrt to Eric's comments. BOOT_TIMEOUT changed to START_DELAY, updated wording in the conf file to better reflect what this does and added a flag to skip sleeping for the first ever started guest. --- tools/libvirt-guests.init.sh |7 +++ tools/l

[libvirt] libvirt-guests - order of stopping/starting guests

Hi all, on a previous thread [1] Eric Blake mentioned: Without more code on the libvirt front, I think you're stuck renaming the guests to enforce naming order (assuming that libvirt even goes by sorted name order, as opposed to readdir() order where you have no control). I poked around the co