On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 05:17:50PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 03:34:03PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 03:58:31PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:33:28AM +, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
>
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 03:58:31PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:33:28AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
> > What if KVM_ARM_SVE_SET_VLS() were to yield 0 if the exact requested set
> > of VLs was configured, -ERANGE if some subset was configur
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 02:17:57PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:43:16AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:28:49PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > New feature KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE:
> >
> > * enables exposure of SVE to the guest
> >
> > * enables visibility
Hi all,
Reposting this to give people another chance to comment before I move
ahead...
---8<---
Here's a second, slightly more complete stab at the KVM API extensions
for SVE.
I haven't started implementing in earnest yet, so any comments at this
stage would be very helpful.
[libvir-list read
Hi all,
Here's a second, slightly more complete stab at the KVM API extensions
for SVE.
I haven't started implementing in earnest yet, so any comments at this
stage would be very helpful.
[libvir-list readers: this is a proposal for extending the KVM API on
AArch64 systems to support the Scalab
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:58:16PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 December 2017 at 16:55, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Vector length control:
> >
> > Some means is needed to determine the set of vector lengths visible
> > to guest software running on a vcpu.
> >
&g
