[libvirt] Question about the libvirt Java bindings

2010-05-24 Thread Dustin Xiong
Dear all: I encounter a problem when I running the libvirt java bindings test program. I download the libvirt-java-0.4.3.tar.gz. Then compiled successful, but the test program can't running. # ant build Buildfile: build.xml init: [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/dustin/libvirt-java-0.4.3

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] qemu: Check for ia64 kvm

2010-01-13 Thread Dustin Xiong
> From: crobi...@redhat.com > To: libvirt-l...@redhat.com > CC: x_k_...@hotmail.com; crobi...@redhat.com > Subject: [PATCH] qemu: Check for ia64 kvm > Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:50:06 -0500 > > From: Dustin Xiong > > Ported to current code. Untested, but buil

Re: [libvirt] [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running on Arch of Itanium 64

2010-01-10 Thread Dustin Xiong
diff -rup a/libvirt-0.6.3/src/qemu_conf.c b/libvirt-0.6.3/src/qemu_conf.c --- a/libvirt-0.6.3/src/qemu_conf.c 2010-01-11 09:15:45.0 +0800 +++ b/libvirt-0.6.3/src/qemu_conf.c 2010-01-11 09:14:34.0 +0800 @@ -195,6 +195,10 @@ static const char *const arch_info_hvm_p "g3b

Re: [libvirt] [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running on Arch of Itanium 64

2010-01-07 Thread Dustin Xiong
> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:15:32 -0500 > From: crobi...@redhat.com > To: x_k_...@hotmail.com > CC: berra...@redhat.com; libvirt-l...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [libvirt] [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running > on Arch of Itanium 64 > > On 01/07/201

Re: [libvirt] [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running on Arch of Itanium 64

2010-01-06 Thread Dustin Xiong
> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:09:55 -0500 > From: crobi...@redhat.com > To: x_k_...@hotmail.com > CC: berra...@redhat.com; libvirt-l...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [libvirt] [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running > on Arch of Itanium 64 > > On 01/04/201

Re: [libvirt] [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running on Arch of Itanium 64

2010-01-04 Thread Dustin Xiong
> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:46:06 -0500 > From: crobi...@redhat.com > To: x_k_...@hotmail.com > CC: berra...@redhat.com; libvirt-l...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [libvirt] [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running > on Arch of Itanium 64 > > On 12/25/200

Re: [libvirt] [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running on Arch of Itanium 64

2009-12-25 Thread Dustin Xiong
gt; On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05:08AM +0800, Dustin Xiong wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:16:05 + > > > From: berra...@redhat.com > > > To: crobi...@redhat.com > > > CC: x_k_...@hotmail.com; libvirt-l...@redhat.com; > > > virt-tools-l...

[libvirt] RE: [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running on Arch of Itanium 64

2009-12-17 Thread Dustin Xiong
2009 at 05:07:00PM +0800, Dustin Xiong wrote: > > But when I run virsh ,it failed as below: > > [r...@kvm bin]# ./virsh > > error: unable to connect to > > '/usr/local/dlibvirt/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock': No such file or > > directory >

[libvirt] RE: [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running on Arch of Itanium 64

2009-12-09 Thread Dustin Xiong
> >>...<<< > >> > I downloaded and compiled the latest version of virtinst: > > virtinst-0.500.0.tar.gz. > >> > then compile the virt-manager-0.8.0, error changed as below: > >> > > >> > [r...@kvm virt-manager-0.8.0]# make check > >> > Making check in src > >> > make[1]: Entering direct

[libvirt] RE: [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running on Arch of Itanium 64

2009-11-23 Thread Dustin Xiong
gt; > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:09:28AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote: > > On 11/23/2009 01:43 AM, Dustin Xiong wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:14:09 -0500, cole wrote: > > >> > > >> cc-ing libvirt-list > > >> > > > &g

[libvirt] RE: [virt-tools-list] Questions about virt-manager running on Arch of Itanium 64

2009-11-23 Thread Dustin Xiong
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:14:09 -0500, cole wrote: > > cc-ing libvirt-list > > On 11/19/2009 10:35 PM, Dustin Xiong wrote: > > > > > >>> Hi everyone! > >>> I am a newer to the virt-manager and maillist. I sent the mail just want > >>&