On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Walter Stanish < walter.stan...@saffrondigital.com> wrote:
> Hi libvir-list (cc: vserver list), > > I am another Linux-vServer user who would like to see support in libvirt. > > From a very brief look back through the archives it appears that there may > have been some architectural concerns re: libvirt's assumptions about what > kind of network stack a virtualisation platform provides, in that > Linux-vServer doesn't use a traditional approach to networking and thus may > break previously valid assumptions. > > I found 2007 posts and a post last year (2009). > I remeber hearing that the patches have been submitted multiple times http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200807/0003.html > Would it be possible for someone with a good overall understanding of > previous integration attempts and the results thereof to summarise what > issues were encountered and how difficult it would be to overcome these, so > that users can understand what's going on. > > The issue: linux-vserver is not sexy and hip like some of those other technologies. Maybe if vserver was a huge hulking patch, had really slow emulation, and or then more or less got killed by being aquired by a large non-open source friendly company... http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/25/xen-spit-it-out-strategy/ ...people would start adopting it.
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list