Re: [libvirt] Is possible that cpu_maps.xml changed during different releases?

Any idea on my assumed scenario? If this is really an issue, it's something we need fix it IMHO. Thanks --jyh > -Original Message- > From: Jiang, Yunhong > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 4:52 PM > To: Eric Blake > Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com > Subject: RE: [li

Re: [libvirt] Is possible that cpu_maps.xml changed during different releases?

release definition to check Host B's capabilities, this is sure to be wrong, since host B does not have feature 'd'. I think the key point is, capabilities describe features with information from cpu_maps.xml, which is a per-host file. Thanks --jyh Will depends on >

Re: [libvirt] Is possible that cpu_maps.xml changed during different releases?

Eric, thanks for the answer very .much, that's really helpful. Sorry for the wrong format, I'm using outlook and possibly some setting wrong. Thanks --jyh > -Original Message- > From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebl...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:23 PM &

[libvirt] Is possible that cpu_maps.xml changed during different releases?

Hi, all I have two questions to the cpu_maps.xml in different releases, hope someone can give me some hints: a) Will it be possible that the features defined in cpu_maps.xml for one specific CPU model (like Nehalem) will be different? For example, one feature is not listed for N