Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v4] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2016-01-22 Thread Leno Hou
On 2016年01月22日 04:08, Laine Stump wrote: On 01/20/2016 08:51 AM, Leno Hou wrote: 1. When switching CPUs to offline/online in a system more than 128 cpus 2. When using virsh to destroy domain in a system with more interface All of above happens nl_recv returned with error: No buffer space

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v3] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2016-01-20 Thread Leno Hou
On 2016年01月14日 04:05, Laine Stump wrote: On 01/13/2016 03:49 AM, Leno Hou wrote: Hi Laine Stump, Any other comments about this patch ? If not, could you help me to review and merge ? Thanks in advance ~~ I just noticed that you haven't done anything about the other places in libvirt where

[libvirt] [PATCH v4] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2016-01-20 Thread Leno Hou
on new function virNetlinkAlloc,as this would solve this problem totally and permanetly. Signed-off-by: Leno Hou <ho...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wenyi Gao <we...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: Laine Stump <la...@laine.org> CC: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com> --- sr

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v3] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2016-01-13 Thread Leno Hou
Hi Laine Stump, Any other comments about this patch ? If not, could you help me to review and merge ? Thanks in advance ~~ On 2016年01月12日 03:32, Laine Stump wrote: On 01/11/2016 05:44 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:59:00PM +0800, Leno Hou wrote: 1. When switching

[libvirt] [PATCH v2] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2016-01-10 Thread Leno Hou
for nl_recv,as this would solve this problem totally and permanetly. Signed-off-by: Leno Hou <ho...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wenyi Gao <we...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: Laine Stump <la...@laine.org> CC: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com> --- src/util/virnetlink.c | 10 ++

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2016-01-10 Thread Leno Hou
Sorry for the wrong function in libnl3. please use the PATCH v3 On 2016年01月11日 14:46, Leno Hou wrote: 1. When switching CPUs to offline/online in a system more than 128 cpus 2. When using virsh to destroy domain in a system with more interface All of above happens nl_recv returned with error

[libvirt] [PATCH v3] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2016-01-10 Thread Leno Hou
for nl_recv,as this would solve this problem totally and permanetly. Signed-off-by: Leno Hou <ho...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wenyi Gao <we...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: Laine Stump <la...@laine.org> CC: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com> --- src/util/virnetlink.c | 10 ++

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v1] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2016-01-10 Thread Leno Hou
version of the patch that provides a general solution as suggested (or similar) and either gives a clickable link to the referenced LTC-Bugzilla issues or removes the reference (former is preferred)? Thanks! On 12/20/2015 05:06 PM, Laine Stump wrote: On 12/18/2015 02:30 AM, Leno Hou wrote:

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v1] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2015-12-17 Thread Leno Hou
On 2015年12月17日 02:33, Laine Stump wrote: On 12/16/2015 10:24 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: On 10.12.2015 07:34, Leno Hou wrote: 1. When switching CPUs to offline/online in a system more than 128 cpus 2. When using virsh to destroy domain in a system with more interface All of above happens

[libvirt] [PATCH v1] libvirtd: Increase NL buffer size for lots of interface

2015-12-10 Thread Leno Hou
for nl_recv, as this would solve this problem totally and permanetly. LTC-Bugzilla: #133359 #125768 Signed-off-by: Leno Hou <ho...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wenyi Gao <we...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- src/util/virnetlink.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/util/virnet