[libvirt] [PATCH go v2] domain.go: wrong calculation of bitmask in PinVcpuFlags()

--- domain.go | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/domain.go b/domain.go index 2bd9852..7276ef8 100644 --- a/domain.go +++ b/domain.go @@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ func (d *Domain) PinVcpuFlags(vcpu uint, cpuMap []bool, flags DomainModification ccpumap :=

[libvirt] [PATCH go v2] domain.go: construct cpumaps correctly for CPU pinning verbs

In PinEmulator() and PinIOThread() there is an identical code that converts []bool into a bitmask. It calculates the location in the bitmask and then sets it always to 1, instead of looking at the actual bool value. --- domain.go | 16 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH go] domain.go: construct cpumaps correctly for CPU pinning verbs

Please ignore this patch, I failed to see that in 2 out of 4 locations we already are looking at the value. I'm sending a better patch instead. On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Leonid Podolny <leo...@podolny.net> wrote: > In PinVcpu(), PinVcpuFlags(), PinEmulator() and Pi

[libvirt] [PATCH go] domain.go: construct cpumaps correctly for CPU pinning verbs

In PinVcpu(), PinVcpuFlags(), PinEmulator() and PinIOThread() there is an almost identical code that converts []bool into a bitmask. It calculates the location in the bitmask and then sets it always to 1, instead of looking at the actual bool value. --- domain.go | 16 1 file

[libvirt] [PATCH] Fix segfault in GetIOThreadInfo

The pointers calculation included a typo which caused segfaults. Signed-off-by: Leonid Podolny <leo...@podolny.net> --- domain.go | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/domain.go b/domain.go index 515138a..74061c2 100644 --- a/domain.go +++ b/domain.go @@ -

[libvirt] [PATCH go] Fix segfault in GetIOThreadInfo

0001-Fix-segfault-in-GetIOThreadInfo.patch Description: Binary data -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list