\--- vm bridge - vm tap dev
\--- vm bridge - vm tap dev
\--- vm bridge - vm tap dev
Why is it disgusting?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
of this
request, plus the benefits of provinding a very stable public API.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
example, sorry. I had a wrong surprise in the
late 2010 and since kept far from the python bindings. I might change to
rely on the bindings if you actually think APIs are long term stable.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
of commands to handle the
process?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
what's happening.
Thank you very much Eric!
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
thinking about.
BTW, I find that the %-ns format is not easy to parse from scripts. It
would be easier with raw variable values and a dedicated separator like
a tabulation.
Human and scripts expectations are so... different! :-)
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list
The 23/01/12, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 04:41:43PM +0100, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 23/01/12, Michal Privoznik wrote:
+By default the hypervisor will try to pick a suitable shutdown
+method. To specify an alternative method, the I--mode parameter
+can
which method will be used.
Or did I missed something?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
that the synchronisation will restart from scratch and that the
system will fail by running out of disk space.
Since attached disks are used in many different use cases, I think it
would be a real gain to have an option per disk to tell if it's critical
or not for the guest to start.
--
Nicolas
# (gzip tarball?)
# virsh import domainone.dom
The tool would do whatever is needed behind the scene (pause, add memory
to the archive, etc).
We could have the same for pools, networks, etc.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
/
+ used for communication to the virtlockd daemon and (soon)
+ for the libvirt_lxc controller process. This document
+ provides an overview of the protocol and structure / operation
+ of the internal RPC library APIs.
+/p
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
(fail)
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz (work)
The only difference I can find is that on all failing systems the
RAID10 module is used. The working system has hardware RAID10 and the
Linux RAID10 is not compiled.
I'll try to investigate this way.
Thanks for the heads up.
--
Nicolas
The 02/08/11, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
I'm stuck!
As told before, I have one working (in production) system and others
failing Gentoo systems (including the testing machine).
I've check the working system against the testing machine and looked for
differences. I did remove differences one
The 27/07/11, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
I'm seeing strange behaviour, here. Any guests saved using both
managedsave and save commands from virsh won't restore at saved state. A
new full boot sequence happen.
- Tested against libvirt v0.9.1, v0.9.2, v0.9.3-r1 (Gentoo)
- Confirmed on three
# list
Id Name State
--
22 homerpaused
virsh # resume homer
Domain homer resumed
virsh #
root@homer uptime
11:06:51 up 0 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
root@homer
Thank you.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list
The 27/07/11, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/27/2011 02:37 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
I'm seeing strange behaviour, here. Any guests saved using both
managedsave and save commands from virsh won't restore at saved state. A
new full boot sequence happen.
- Tested against libvirt v0.9.1, v0.9.2
The 27/07/11, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
I'm seeing strange behaviour, here. Any guests saved using both
managedsave and save commands from virsh won't restore at saved state. A
new full boot sequence happen.
- Tested against libvirt v0.9.1, v0.9.2, v0.9.3-r1 (Gentoo)
- Confirmed on three
sessions lost
- uptime
I've open a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376333 but
had no answer.
Any idea on what could happen or how to inspect it?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
of the base file)
?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
would happen if the user asks for deletion of A (as both
base and snapshot)? Would it be possible? Would it be merged to both B
and C? Using which filename?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
of the filesystem
done from inside the domain?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
, even if the
answers come from the developer mailing list. But as the developer
mailing list get the user traffic, you got your answers back to the
developer mailing list too.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
usefull.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
23 matches
Mail list logo
