Hi,
Thanks for the headup. We totally agree with the reasoning in the
thread. In fact, the last version of OpenNebula is not compatible with
the libvirt driver. We planned to propose the removal of the
OpenNebula driver, and focus our efforts in the DeltaCloud adapter. So
please go ahead and
Hi
Thanks for the comments!!!.
Regarding EC2:
(Short Background). In OpenNebula, a domain can be defined with a
local set of images (DISKS) and with their EC2 counterparts (AMIs). So
depending on your requirements and the status of your cluster the
OpenNebula scheduler may decide to deploy the
OK, we'll do so...
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:55:31PM +0200, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
Hi Daniel
These are great news indeed!. We are already doing the testing of the driver.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH for your help
Hi Daniel
These are great news indeed!. We are already doing the testing of the driver.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH for your help
Ruben
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:14:44PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03,
Hi Daniel,
Right now most of us are out of the office, so we will be able to send
the patches by next week. Sorry for this delay :(
Ruben
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Daniel Veillard veill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 04:26:36PM +0200, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
Hi
. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:23:27AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:01:06PM +0200, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
So, if finally there is some kind of incompatibility with OpenNebula
using Apache2, we have a couple of options:
1- use
Hi Daniel,
First, thank you very much for improving the OpenNebula driver with
your comments. I am totally agree with you suggestion about the
configure.in, it should be a quick fix.
Regarding the licenses, I do not really see the problem. I mean, you
can link with GPL and Apache as libvirt is
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 09:12:00 Daniel Veillard wrote:
Ok. It sounds fine. We will update our implementation to CVS head (right
now the patch is targeted for 0.4.4), update licenses to LGPL, and we
will check if 'make check syntax-check' works. Also We'll try to split
the patch in
Ruben
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 00:29:09 Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:32:54PM +0100, Ruben S. Montero wrote:
On Monday 03 November 2008 17:59:33 Daniel Veillard wrote:
This is a bit against the Node principle of libvirt, and could result
in some fun
Dear all,
You may find of interest a new implementation of the libvirt
virtualization API. This new implementation adds support to OpenNebula, a
distributed VM manager system. The implementation of libvirt on top of a
distributed VM manager, like OpenNebula, provides an abstraction of a
On Monday 03 November 2008 17:59:33 Daniel Veillard wrote:
This is a bit against the Node principle of libvirt, and could result
in some fun in the hardware discovery mode, but in general the approach
might work. Still we are looking at bits on the node to provide
capabilities of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
