Re: [Libvir] VIR_DOMAIN_NOSTATE

2008-01-29 Thread Russ Blaine
out). So is there some other state implied by domain_flags being 0? In all cases I have seen, the domain is actually running -- accumulating CPU time, etc. - Russ Blaine | Solaris Kernel | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir

Re: [Libvir] VIR_DOMAIN_NOSTATE

2008-01-29 Thread Russ Blaine
Host is Solaris, guest is WinXP. Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Russ Blaine wrote: Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Can you edit the src/xen_internal.c file and in the xenHypervisorGetDomInfo() method, add a printf() for the 'domain_flags' flags variable. IMHO the way we deal with this isn't quite

Re: [Libvir] VIR_DOMAIN_NOSTATE

2008-01-29 Thread Russ Blaine
in getdomaininfo, from xen/common/domctl.c - Russ Blaine | Solaris Kernel | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Libvir] VIR_DOMAIN_NOSTATE

2008-01-25 Thread Russ Blaine
their act together, that do not always return a valid guest state. Is that the case? Is anyone else seeing this on Xen? -- - Russ Blaine | Solaris Kernel | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com

Re: [Libvir] VIR_DOMAIN_NOSTATE

2008-01-25 Thread Russ Blaine
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Russ Blaine wrote: On Solaris-based xen 3.1.2 I am seeing virDomainGetInfo() often returning VIR_DOMAIN_NOSTATE in dominfo.state for domUs that are powered on and running. What exactly does VIR_DOMAIN_NOSTATE mean? Why does it exist? I suspect it is a catch-all