Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-19 Thread Mark Johnson
On 6/19/07, Daniel P. Berrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:31:02AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: > >> On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, want to keep the 3 digit numbers in virsh. Even though Xen can only give us 2 meaningful digits, the QEMU drive

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:31:02AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: > >> On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is the suggestion to change xend_internal/xen_internal to not set rev > >> and remove the display of the hypervisor rev in virsh? Or is it > >something > >> else? > > > >

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-19 Thread Mark Johnson
> On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is the suggestion to change xend_internal/xen_internal to not set rev > and remove the display of the hypervisor rev in virsh? Or is it something > else? Well ideally I would prefer xend to not send something crazy for 'release' but si

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:36:22PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: > Hi,?$B!!Daniel > > ?$B!!I would prefer keep extra in code. > (extra region stores additional info) > > for example (in extra) > xen-unstable : -unstable > fedora7 :.4-1-1.2898.2.3 The extra release info is essentially complete

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-18 Thread Atsushi SAKAI
Hi, Daniel  OK, I understood. So extra description is future work. (but priority is low.) Thanks Atsushi SAKAI Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:36:22PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: > > Hi, Daniel > > > >  I would prefer keep extra in code. > > (extra reg

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-18 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:36:22PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote: > Hi, Daniel > >  I would prefer keep extra in code. > (extra region stores additional info) > > for example (in extra) > xen-unstable : -unstable > fedora7 :.4-1-1.2898.2.3 Not possible as the API allows only for an unsigned

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-18 Thread Atsushi SAKAI
Hi, Daniel  I would prefer keep extra in code. (extra region stores additional info) for example (in extra) xen-unstable : -unstable fedora7 :.4-1-1.2898.2.3 Thanks Atsushi SAKAI Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:26:53PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: >

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-18 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:26:53PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: > Saving the dom0 patch for last :-) > > > On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:27:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-15 Thread Mark Johnson
Saving the dom0 patch for last :-) On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:27:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: > > This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's > > extra versi

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-15 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:27:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: > > This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's > > extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's > > part of an int). > > > > Instead o

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-14 Thread Mark Johnson
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: > This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's > extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's > part of an int). > > Instead of printing out the wr

Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: > This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's > extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's > part of an int). > > Instead of printing out the wrong value, just display > major.minor in virsh. Hmm, so wi

[Libvir] [PATCH] hypervisor version

2007-06-14 Thread Mark Johnson
This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's part of an int). Instead of printing out the wrong value, just display major.minor in virsh. Mark version-fix Description: Binary data -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list