On 6/19/07, Daniel P. Berrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:31:02AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> >> On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, want to keep the 3 digit numbers in virsh. Even though Xen can only give
us 2 meaningful digits, the QEMU drive
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:31:02AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> >> On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is the suggestion to change xend_internal/xen_internal to not set rev
> >> and remove the display of the hypervisor rev in virsh? Or is it
> >something
> >> else?
> >
> >
> On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the suggestion to change xend_internal/xen_internal to not set rev
> and remove the display of the hypervisor rev in virsh? Or is it something
> else?
Well ideally I would prefer xend to not send something crazy for 'release'
but si
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:36:22PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> Hi,?$B!!Daniel
>
> ?$B!!I would prefer keep extra in code.
> (extra region stores additional info)
>
> for example (in extra)
> xen-unstable : -unstable
> fedora7 :.4-1-1.2898.2.3
The extra release info is essentially complete
Hi, Daniel
OK, I understood.
So extra description is future work.
(but priority is low.)
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:36:22PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> > Hi, Daniel
> >
> > I would prefer keep extra in code.
> > (extra reg
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:36:22PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> Hi, Daniel
>
> I would prefer keep extra in code.
> (extra region stores additional info)
>
> for example (in extra)
> xen-unstable : -unstable
> fedora7 :.4-1-1.2898.2.3
Not possible as the API allows only for an unsigned
Hi, Daniel
I would prefer keep extra in code.
(extra region stores additional info)
for example (in extra)
xen-unstable : -unstable
fedora7 :.4-1-1.2898.2.3
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:26:53PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:26:53PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> Saving the dom0 patch for last :-)
>
>
> On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:27:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
Saving the dom0 patch for last :-)
On 6/15/07, Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:27:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> > This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's
> > extra versi
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:27:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> > This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's
> > extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's
> > part of an int).
> >
> > Instead o
On 6/14/07, Daniel P. Berrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's
> extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's
> part of an int).
>
> Instead of printing out the wr
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's
> extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's
> part of an int).
>
> Instead of printing out the wrong value, just display
> major.minor in virsh.
Hmm, so wi
This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's
extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's
part of an int).
Instead of printing out the wrong value, just display
major.minor in virsh.
Mark
version-fix
Description: Binary data
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list
13 matches
Mail list logo
