Hi,
I would like to talk more about this.
Can I hear your comments ?
Thanks,
Saori Fukuta
On Wed, 16 May 2007 10:07:06 +0900 Saori Fukuta wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 14:06:07 -0400 Daniel Veillard wrote:
Can I ask something ? That means adding xmlDomainPtr to virDomainPtr,
like this ?
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:36:30 -0400 Daniel Veillard wrote:
Well I have though about it more, and I'm afraid that proposal 1 makes
things
more complex due to the duplication of APIs. I think proposal 2 makes more
sense, i.e. be able to create a Domain object from a config file. We just need
Hi,
Thank you for your comment !
On Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33:57 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It sounds to me like the real solution would be to either fix
virDomainGetXMLDesc to return these missing fields, or add another call
to get them, or (for the password) to store it elsewhere.
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:57:10PM +0900, Saori Fukuta wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:36:30 -0400 Daniel Veillard wrote:
Well I have though about it more, and I'm afraid that proposal 1 makes
things
more complex due to the duplication of APIs. I think proposal 2 makes more
sense, i.e.
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:59:37PM +0900, Saori Fukuta wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your comment !
On Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33:57 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It sounds to me like the real solution would be to either fix
virDomainGetXMLDesc to return these missing fields, or add another
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:07:50PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:59:37PM +0900, Saori Fukuta wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your comment !
On Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33:57 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It sounds to me like the real solution would be to either fix
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:59:37PM +0900, Saori Fukuta wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your comment !
On Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33:57 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It sounds to me like the real solution would be to either fix
virDomainGetXMLDesc to return these missing fields,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:06:51PM +0900, Saori Fukuta wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your proposal ! I considered the way with it.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:35:15 -0400 Daniel Veillard wrote:
So I have a problem with this, and I suggest to isolate configuration
file APIs, which in
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your proposal ! I considered the way with it.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:35:15 -0400 Daniel Veillard wrote:
So I have a problem with this, and I suggest to isolate configuration
file APIs, which in practice would mean client code a bit more verbose
but keeping the API
Hi,
I'm making a patch to provide a changing allocation dynamically and statically
without keeping state at the library.
And this is still uncompleted works, but I would like to hear your comments.
Attached patch shows below:
# virsh --help setmem
NAME
setmem - change memory allocation
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:32:33PM +0900, Saori Fukuta wrote:
Hi Daniel
Hi Saori,
I'm sorry I might be disrespectful a little...
No, you were not. I'm just stating I'm thinking of the problem in different
terms, which I think are open to discussion.
I understood descriptions of domains,
11 matches
Mail list logo
