Jim Meyering wrote:
"Daniel P. Berrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:31:06PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
This patch was prompted by warnings like this:
util.c:56: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
Hmm, what compiler version are you using ?
"Daniel P. Berrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:31:06PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> This patch was prompted by warnings like this:
>>
>> util.c:56: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
>
> Hmm, what compiler version are you using ? I don't se
[resending with the patch in-line, not as an attachment --
mailman removed my attached patch the first time! Bad mailman. Bad. ]
This patch was prompted by warnings like this:
util.c:56: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
and they're legitimate.
Imagine a format s
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:31:06PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> This patch was prompted by warnings like this:
>
> util.c:56: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
Hmm, what compiler version are you using ? I don't see those warnings when
I build. Or did you add extra com
This patch was prompted by warnings like this:
util.c:56: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
and they're legitimate.
Imagine a format string contains "%%..." goes through the vnsprintf
call, which reduces it to "%...". If the result string is then passed
to __virRais
