On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 03:23:50PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> I just noticed that the patch got mangled, sorry:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:09:15PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > That said it might also be worthwhile to not let libvirtd segfault
> > because of a missing call to qemudReportEr
I just noticed that the patch got mangled, sorry:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:09:15PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> That said it might also be worthwhile to not let libvirtd segfault
> because of a missing call to qemudReportError - this is debatable
> though:
diff --git a/src/qemu_conf.c b/src/qe
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:09:15PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:06:14PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> > without this qemudParseVMDef might return NULL when the boot dev
> > configuration is invalid but virGetLastError returns NULL either since
> > no error has been set
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:06:14PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> without this qemudParseVMDef might return NULL when the boot dev
> configuration is invalid but virGetLastError returns NULL either since
> no error has been set, this leads to a segfault in qemudLoadConfig when
> trying to print the
