[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: I cannot for the life of me find the rpcgen source. I thought maybe if I could get it to recompile on OS X I could build it with hyper support. There's a million different versions of the RPC tools, all derived from some source that Sun released into the wild back in

[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Schley Andrew Kutz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I cannot for the life of me find the rpcgen source. I thought maybe if I could get it to recompile on OS X I could build it with hyper support. - -- - -a On Jan 22, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: -BE

[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You are correct, it was using the old build that I had installed, which I had changed to 'long'. G. So, perhaps if we can get the XDR stuff to work, libvirt will work too. Don't worry - I'm just now porting the Windo

[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Schley Andrew Kutz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You are correct, it was using the old build that I had installed, which I had changed to 'long'. G. So, perhaps if we can get the XDR stuff to work, libvirt will work too. - -- - -a On Jan 22, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

Re: [Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Schley Andrew Kutz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I concur. The types are clearly defined in /usr/include/rpc/xdr.h. - -- - -a On Jan 22, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:37:05PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIG

Re: [Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:37:05PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >I did that originally, but since rebuilt it with a clean file (inserting > >the xdr.h header as I said) and it built. Then I tried connecting a

[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I did that originally, but since rebuilt it with a clean file (inserting the xdr.h header as I said) and it built. Then I tried connecting and it fails. I can't reproduce this here. For me, it isn't sufficient just to a

[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Schley Andrew Kutz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I did that originally, but since rebuilt it with a clean file (inserting the xdr.h header as I said) and it built. Then I tried connecting and it fails. - -- - -a On Jan 22, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Schley Andrew Kutz wrot

[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'd like to figure out why the exception is getting thrown. I built it from HEAD, and I still cannot connect. Do we still think this ties back to the XDR problems? Have you by any chance replaced all "hyper" in remote_pr

[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Schley Andrew Kutz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It makes the 'missing symbol' warnings go away. - -- - -a On Jan 22, 2008, at 9:15 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: 6. Add #include to qemu/remote_protocol.h. This fixes the build problem where it cannot find the symbol

[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Schley Andrew Kutz wrote: 6. Add #include to qemu/remote_protocol.h. This fixes the build problem where it cannot find the symbol _xdr_quad_t. Adding this header doesn't help me to get xdr_quad_t ... that just doesn't exist in the Leopard header files. Rich. -- Emerging Technologies, Red H

[Libvir] Re: PKG_CHECK_EXISTS

2008-01-22 Thread Jim Meyering
"Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> * PKG_CHECK_EXISTS macro doesn't exist and has to be commented out >> everywhere. This is despite the fact that I have pkg-config from >> Macports installed. > > Looking into this in a bit more detail -- Macports insta