On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:33:10PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 01:12:04AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> > > >We're already doing this internally for Xen. In theory, it shouldn't be
> > > >too much harder to do the same with libvirt. Ryan?
> > >
> > > The biggest problem
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 01:12:04AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > >We're already doing this internally for Xen. In theory, it shouldn't be
> > >too much harder to do the same with libvirt. Ryan?
> >
> > The biggest problem would be dealing with incoming patches that conflict
> > with our inte
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 03:27:29PM -0800, Ryan Scott wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:43:50PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >>(3) Set up some automated builders to build daily versions of libvirt
> >>on other platforms. "Name and shame" by posting the results to th
John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:43:50PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
(3) Set up some automated builders to build daily versions of libvirt
on other platforms. "Name and shame" by posting the results to this
list so hopefully people are motivated to make fixes.
We're already
