Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28

2007-03-07 Thread David Lutterkort
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 04:33 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: Keeping C library based binding for a Java application is really annoying, and JNI is like designed to make this hard. I would expect large clusters monitoring solutions to be often Java based and we need to have a network API for

Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28

2007-03-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:25 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: So far, the release model for libvirt (correct me if I'm wrong) has been that you periodically bundle up the latest version of libvirt and put it on the website. There's no experimental branch where we can

Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28

2007-03-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Mark McLoughlin wrote: - I'm not sure the libvirt API is really well designed for remote use, so I'm not sure that mapping the API calls to RPC calls is the best approach. The level that is right for abstraction is definitely troubling to me. For example at the moment it'll work

Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28

2007-03-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:49:42AM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 13:56 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Do you have some actual concrete problems with SunRPC? For me it solves the problem of marshalling complicated data structures, including all the error

Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28

2007-03-01 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hey, Btw, I'm really becoming quite convinced we'll evenutally regret using SunRPC if we stick with it. On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 21:03 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote +AC_PATH_PROG(LOGGER, logger) +AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(LOGGER, $LOGGER, + [Define the location of the external

Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28

2007-03-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey, Btw, I'm really becoming quite convinced we'll evenutally regret using SunRPC if we stick with it. Morning Mark, thanks for taking the time to look at the patch in detail. Do you have some actual concrete problems with SunRPC? For me it solves the problem

Add lots of warning flags to CFLAGS [was Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28]

2007-03-01 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:20 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: dnl dnl make CFLAGS very pedantic at least during the devel phase for everybody +dnl (Overriding $CFLAGS here is very wrong. See discussion of AM_CFLAGS +dnl in the automake info. - RWMJ) dnl if test ${GCC} = yes ;

Re: Add lots of warning flags to CFLAGS [was Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28]

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:09:26PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 16:06 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: @@ -75,7 +77,7 @@ dnl dnl make CFLAGS very pedantic at least during the devel phase for everybody dnl if test ${GCC} = yes ; then - CFLAGS=-g -O -W

Re: Add lots of warning flags to CFLAGS [was Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28]

2007-03-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 16:16 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:09:26PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Uh, never mind this ... fixed patch attached. Looks good to me, lets commit it. Done. Now, who wants to make it build with

Re: Add lots of warning flags to CFLAGS [was Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28]

2007-03-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 16:16 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:09:26PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Uh, never mind this ... fixed patch attached. Looks good to me, lets commit it. Done. Now, who wants to