On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:39:46AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >file for dealing with VM memory. Fortunately they are all using memory in
> >size of KB, so we are not totally doomed until people start wanting to
> >manage VMs with > 2 TB of RAM. Also fortunately, the wire-encoding for
> >
Quoting "Richard W.M. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Just discovered that on x86_64, Windows and Linux differ in what they
think sizeof(long) to be.
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-01/msg00736.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/200
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:33:47AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Just discovered that on x86_64, Windows and Linux differ in what they
> think sizeof(long) to be.
>
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-01/msg00736.html
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/200
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Just discovered that on x86_64, Windows and Linux differ in what they
think sizeof(long) to be.
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-01/msg00736.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-July/038602.html
Oh yes. I haven't even tried
Just discovered that on x86_64, Windows and Linux differ in what they
think sizeof(long) to be.
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-01/msg00736.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-July/038602.html
Windows i686:sizeof(long) == 4, sizeof(void*) == 4
